Skip to content
Scan Health Plan at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Scan Health Plan

Scan's mission is to keep seniors healthy and independent.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$13MFood & Nutrition$2.8MHuman Services$2.0MEducation$732kHousing & Shelter$392kPublic Safety & Disaster$330kPublic Benefit$150kArts & Culture$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 51 grants below total $4,768,906, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,999,740 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $230,834 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $842k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.8M
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION$2,800,000
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION$1,000,000
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER$62,500
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT$50,000
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$46,906
PROYECTO PASTORAL$30,000
SOURCEWISE$30,000
KOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER (DBA KHEIR CLINIC)$30,000
SERVICE OPPORTUNITY FOR SENIORS (DBA SOS MEALS ON WHEELS)$30,000
ALTAMED FOUNDATION$25,000
COMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC (DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OC)$25,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$25,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$25,000
ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARIN SENIOR COORDINATING COUNCIL: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $20k → 9%CERES COMMUNITYPROJECT: $25k → 9%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS (LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION AND ACTION IN HEALTH): $20k → 10%COVE COMMUNITIES SENIOR ASSOCIATION (DBA THE JOSLYN CENTER): $25k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $25k → 14%TURLOCK GOSPEL MISSION: $25k → 15%INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICES PEG TAYLOR: $30k → 18%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $285k → 13%CERES COMMUNITYPROJECT: $25k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $25k → 14%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $25k → 19%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $50k → 13%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $20k → 11%SOURCEWISE: $30k → 8%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $20k → 11%FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS: $25k → 15%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $20k → 15%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $25k → 8%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $25k → 10%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $20k → 10%SENIOR CONCERNS: $20k → 10%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS: $20k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $35k → 10%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%SERVING SENIORS: $25k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%ONLOK: $25k → 10%ABRAZAR INC: $25k → 10%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE (WLCAC): $36k → 14%HUMAN SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%UNITED AMERICAN INDIAN INVOLVEMENT: $35k → 14%UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $25k → 14%UMMA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $25k → 14%ENGAGE: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 105 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

105 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
84

Total granted

$17M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+32%

Still filing today

95%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $497k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11M · revenue ×13 · 99% of their budget
  • LB
    LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $394k · revenue +160%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $375k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +74%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $160k
  • HA
    HIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
2
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
3
Santa Clarita Valley Committee On Aging

The SCVCOA and the Senior Center currently serves more than 10,000 individuals annually through varied programming for the Santa Clarita Valley and Antelope Valley that includes but is not limited to: congregate and home delivered meals…

Human Services
4
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
5
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
6
Curry Senior Center

To provide services to seniors that promote independent living while maintaining their dignity and self-esteem.

Human Services
7
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
8
Senior Nutrition Program of San Luis Obispo County

Provide meals and nutritional education to seniors in San Luis Obispo County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals on Wheels by Acc

Our mission is to serve nutritious meals with a friendly smile to seniors in Sacramento County.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Irvine Adult Day Health Services Inc

Irvine adult day health services, together with families and the community, promotes a lifestyle of health, independence and active living for disabled and older adults.

Human Services
12
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Seniorserv Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gwendolyn and Joseph Straus Charitable Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

206 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 206 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
201/206
Grantees still filing
156/206
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC: $10,500,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC+37 more: $1,890,300 · Health+37 moreMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $334,719 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RE…SERVING SENIORS: $125,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE ON AGING: $110,000 · Human ServicesHuman Services Association: $95,000 · Human ServicesCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $95,000 · Human Services+61 more: $1,872,450 · Human Services+61 moreLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $175,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES L…THE SALVATION ARMY: $160,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION…ONEGENERATION: $140,000 · OtherONEGENERATIONSTRAIGHT TALK: $90,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $85,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $80,000 · OtherHIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 · Other+60 more: $1,538,390 · Other+60 moreLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $393,500 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $168,431 · EducationHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT: $120,000 · EducationOne in Long Beach Inc dba The LGBTQ Center Long Beach: $50,000 · Education+4 more: $95,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $115,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $95,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD SHARE INC: $75,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $60,000 · Food & NutritionSERVICE OPPORTUNITY FOR SENIORS: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOODBANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $30,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand: $30,000 · Food & NutritionSt Francis Living Room: $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more: $115,000 · Food & NutritionE4E RELIEF LLC: $300,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFUSE Corps: $150,000 · Public Benefit
Health$12,390,300Human Services$2,632,169Other$2,368,390Education$826,931Food & Nutrition$730,000Public Safety & Disaster$300,000Public Benefit$150,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC: $10,500,000 over 4y, 99% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $393,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $375,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $334,719 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetE4E RELIEF LLC: $300,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $168,431 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFUSE Corps: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetONEGENERATION: $140,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH: $136,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $135,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSERVING SENIORS: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH INDUSTRY COLLABORATION EFFRT: $120,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $115,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE ON AGING: $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER AMBITION LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Services Association: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONEJO VALLEY SENIOR CONCERNS INC: $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG TERM CARE MEDICINE: $72,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING: $70,550 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetENGAGE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $68,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER: $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $65,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSMILES FOR SENIORS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $57,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $55,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFallbrook Healthcare Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAFFORDABLE LIVING FOR THE AGING: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAge Well Senior Services Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST VINCENT SENIOR CITIZEN NUTRITION PROGRAM INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Weingart FoundationArchstone FoundationThe California Endowm…California Community …Public Health Institu…The Ralph M Parsons F…California Healthcare…The California Wellne…Cedars-Sinai Medical …Dignity HealthNational Council on A…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA100.9× affinity88 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · Archstone Foundation · The California Endowment · California Community Foundation · Public Health Institute · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Dignity Health · National Council on Aging Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scan Health Plan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scan Health Plan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    103report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Scan Health Plan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home