Skip to content
Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein at a glance

· Private foundation

Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$857k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$257k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$362kRecreation & Sports$268kEducation$238kHuman Services$225kYouth Development$47kHealth$19kCrime & Legal$14kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $600k
  • $250k+1 grant · $257k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY CAMP ALO$257,000
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGEL$200,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITSL OF LOS ANGELES$200,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIERSITY NORTHRID$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%USS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTE: $10k → 11%GEORGIANA BRUCE KIRBY PREPARATORY S: $3k → 13%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6k → 10%USS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTE: $4k → 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $6k → 10%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $7k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIERSITY NORTHRID: $200k → 14%CHILDRENS HOSPITSL OF LOS ANGELES: $200k → 14%CALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $7k → 14%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRI: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY CAMP ALO: $257k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%CALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $6k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%CALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $5k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%AE WRIGHT SUPPORT FUND: $3k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%CALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $2k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGEL: $200k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $16k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $12k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $10k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $10k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $7k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $7k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $7k → 14%CENTER THEATRE GROUP: $6k → 14%NA'AMAT USA: $4k → 14%STUDENTS RUN LA: $10k → 14%STUDENTS RUN LA: $10k → 14%STUDENTS RUN LA: $6k → 14%STUDENTS RUN LA: $3k → 14%STUDENTS RUN LA: $3k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO: $5k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO: $4k → 14%LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASOCIATON CO: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASOCIATON CO: $3k → 14%NA'AMAT USA: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 25 repeat orgs$865k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$333k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+16%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $857k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    STUDENTS RUN AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +116%
  • UM
    USS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +20%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • GB
    GEORGIANA BRUCE KIRBY PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -14%
  • AW
    AE WRIGHT SUPPORT FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    COLEL CHABAD
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
2
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
3
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

—
4
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
5
Crossroads School for Arts and Sciences

Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.

Education
6
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
7
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
8
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
9
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
10
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
11
The Center for Early Education

The center for early education, a socio-economically and culturally diverse independent school for children, toddlers through grade six, strives to graduate students who are joyful, resilient, lifelong learners. the center embraces a…

Education
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interlochen Center for the Arts; the most unlike its peers is Sincerely Royal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY CAMP ALO: $257,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY CAMP ALOCHILDRENS HOSPITSL OF LOS ANGELES: $200,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITSL OF LOS ANGELESCALIFORNIA STATE UNIERSITY NORTHRID: $200,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIERSITY NORTHRIDCALABASAS HIGH SCHOOL THEATRE: $28,500 · Other+18 more: $97,800 · Other+18 morePERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $200,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS …CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $74,300 · Arts & CultureCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS AN…USS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE INC: $31,000 · Arts & CultureUSS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COM…INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $38,000 · Youth DevelopmentSINCERELY ROYAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationDEBBIE ALLEN DANCE INC DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationGEORGIANA BRUCE KIRBY PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $3,250 · EducationChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $18,800 · HealthTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $2,000 · Environment
Other$783,300Arts & Culture$317,300Youth Development$48,500Education$28,250Health$18,800Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $74,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $38,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUSS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE INC: $31,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $18,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSINCERELY ROYAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY: $9,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNA'AMAT USA The Women's Labor Zionist Organization of America: $7,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDEBBIE ALLEN DANCE INC DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIANA BRUCE KIRBY PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPenny Lane Centers: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS RUN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds USS MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SINCERELY ROYAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NA'AMAT USA The Women's Labor Zionist Organization of America ↗
  • Who funds DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE INC DEBBIE ALLEN DANCE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIANA BRUCE KIRBY PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds Penny Lane Centers ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ahmanson FoundationCA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein?

    Find your warmest path to Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sascha Brastoff Foundation Co Joyce Klein’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home