Skip to content
San Francisco Market Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

San Francisco Market Corporation

Our mission is to connect and grow the region's food agriculture community from our wholesale market in the heart of san francisco.

$1.5M
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$621k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Health$1.4MEmployment$368kArts & Culture$306kHuman Services$299kCommunity Improvement$289kReligion$96kYouth Development$48kRecreation & Sports$46kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $490k
  • $250k+2 grants · $890k
$249,527
Median grant
2
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMIES ORGANIZING THE MISSION TO EMPOWER YOUTH$620,653
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC DBA HELUNA HEALTH PHFE$269,809
CHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA$249,527
FARMING HOPE$240,003
WOMENS BUILDING INC$40,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM INC$35,012
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $371k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $62k → 11%SF NEW DEAL: $235k → 10%ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $33k → 10%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $41k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 6 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +233% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$876k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+233%
+67%

Still filing today

83%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Homies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $776k · revenue +287% · 54% of their budget
  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $428k · revenue +398%
  • FH
    FARMING HOPE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $348k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • SN
    SF New Dealgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $235k · revenue +59%
  • BH
    Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Incgraduated
    3× · 2020–2023 · $114k · revenue +67%
  • EC
    Episcopal Community Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $62k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
2
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
4
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

—
5
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
6
Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association

Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center's mission is to provide opportunities for the individuals and families in the North Beach, Chinatown,Fisherman's wharf and Mission Bay neighborhoods to enrich their quality of life.

Community Improvement
7
Bayanihan Equity Center

The Bayanihan Equity Center provides culturally responsive services to address the needs and advance the rights of marginalized communities in pursuit of equity and justice.

Public Benefit
8
Hunters Point Family Inc

The Hunters Point Family mission is to prepare youth to become independent, strong, and productive adults through comprehensive support services that empower them to develop their full potential.

Youth Development
9
Neighborhood House Assn

Developing children, families, and future leaders of our communities through empowerment, education, and wellness from our house to yours. this is done by leading the way in developing confident, self-sufficient, healthy families and…

Human Services
10
Oceanview Merced Ingleside Cultural Participation Project

OMI-CPP serves San Franciscos 94112 and 94132 neighborhoods by promoting equity, inclusion, and empowerment through multicultural events, homeless outreach, civic engagement, small business marketing & graphic design, and social justice…

Community Improvement
11
Bayview Hunters Point for Community Improvement

Provide support services for the community relating to mental health, substance abuse, youth services & violence prevention.

—
12
Mission Neighborhood Centers Inc

Mnc promotes and develops leadership by delivering culturally sensitive,multi-generational, community-based services that empower families to build strong,healthy, and vibrant neighborhoods.mnc serves low income latino, african…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Council of Human Service; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Community Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $428,391 · OtherPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISE…Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc: $114,392 · OtherBayview Hunters Point Multipurpose …WOMENS BUILDING INC: $89,724 · OtherWOMENS BUILDING INCTHIRD BAPTIST CHURCH: $57,332 · OtherTHIRD BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $47,895 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHUNTERS POINT RESIDENT COUNCIL TENANT ASSOCIATION: $40,631 · OtherDOUBLE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH: $38,885 · OtherWISE HEALTH SF: $38,867 · Other+2 more: $36,306 · OtherHomies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY: $775,613 · HealthHomies Organizing The Mission To …Homeless Prenatal Program Inc: $65,609 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program IncSF New Deal: $235,432 · Human ServicesSF New DealEpiscopal Community Services: $61,587 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Comm…SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $40,860 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST COMM…ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $33,038 · Human ServicesASIANWEEK FOUN…FARMING HOPE: $348,008 · EmploymentFARMING HOPECHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA: $305,533 · Arts & CultureCHAVALOS DE…3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC: $41,525 · Youth DevelopmentHeat of the Kitchen: $6,005 · Youth DevelopmentOUR KIDS FIRST EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM: $45,627 · Recreation & SportsBAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC: $37,440 · Community Improvement
Other$892,423Health$841,222Human Services$370,917Employment$348,008Arts & Culture$305,533Youth Development$47,530Recreation & Sports$45,627Community Improvement$37,440

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHomies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY: $775,613 over 2y, 54% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $428,391 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFARMING HOPE: $348,008 over 2y, 13% of budgetCHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA: $305,533 over 2y, 88% of budgetSF New Deal: $235,432 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $65,609 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services: $61,587 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $33,038 over 3y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…ExtrafoodCrankstart FoundationStupski FoundationPublic Health Institu…McNabb FoundationMarin Community Found…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Extrafood · Crankstart Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Public Health Institute · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Francisco Market Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Francisco Market Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Francisco Market’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home