Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

San Francisco Market Corporation

Our mission is to connect and grow the region's food agriculture community from our wholesale market in the heart of san francisco.

$1.5M
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$621k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202021.

Health$1.4MEmployment$368kArts & Culture$306kHuman Services$299kCommunity Improvement$289kReligion$96kYouth Development$48kRecreation & Sports$46kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $490k
  • $250k+2 grants · $890k
$249,527
Median grant
2
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMIES ORGANIZING THE MISSION TO EMPOWER YOUTH$620,653
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC DBA HELUNA HEALTH PHFE$269,809
CHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA$249,527
FARMING HOPE$240,003
WOMENS BUILDING INC$40,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM INC$35,012
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $371k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $62k → 11%SF NEW DEAL: $235k → 10%ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION: $33k → 10%SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $41k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 6 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +233% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$876k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+233%
+67%

Still filing today

83%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    Homies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $776k · revenue +287% · 54% of their budget
  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $428k · revenue +398%
  • FH
    FARMING HOPE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $348k · revenue +233%

Funded once

  • SN
    SF New Dealgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $235k · revenue +59%
  • BH
    Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Incgraduated
    3× · 2020–2023 · $114k · revenue +67%
  • EC
    Episcopal Community Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $62k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
2
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

4
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

5
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
6
Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association

Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center's mission is to provide opportunities for the individuals and families in the North Beach, Chinatown,Fisherman's wharf and Mission Bay neighborhoods to enrich their quality of life.

Community Improvement
7
Bayanihan Equity Center

The Bayanihan Equity Center provides culturally responsive services to address the needs and advance the rights of marginalized communities in pursuit of equity and justice.

Public Benefit
8
Hunters Point Family Inc

The Hunters Point Family mission is to prepare youth to become independent, strong, and productive adults through comprehensive support services that empower them to develop their full potential.

Youth Development
9
Neighborhood House Assn

Developing children, families, and future leaders of our communities through empowerment, education, and wellness from our house to yours. this is done by leading the way in developing confident, self-sufficient, healthy families and…

Human Services
10
Oceanview Merced Ingleside Cultural Participation Project

OMI-CPP serves San Franciscos 94112 and 94132 neighborhoods by promoting equity, inclusion, and empowerment through multicultural events, homeless outreach, civic engagement, small business marketing & graphic design, and social justice…

Community Improvement
11
Bayview Hunters Point for Community Improvement

Provide support services for the community relating to mental health, substance abuse, youth services & violence prevention.

12
Mission Neighborhood Centers Inc

Mnc promotes and develops leadership by delivering culturally sensitive,multi-generational, community-based services that empower families to build strong,healthy, and vibrant neighborhoods.mnc serves low income latino, african…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Council of Human Service and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Community Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $428,391 · OtherPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISE…Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc — $114,392 · OtherBayview Hunters Point Multipurpose …WOMENS BUILDING INC — $89,724 · OtherWOMENS BUILDING INCTHIRD BAPTIST CHURCH — $57,332 · OtherTHIRD BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $47,895 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHUNTERS POINT RESIDENT COUNCIL TENANT ASSOCIATION — $40,631 · OtherDOUBLE ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH — $38,885 · OtherWISE HEALTH SF — $38,867 · Other+2 more — $36,306 · OtherHomies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY — $775,613 · HealthHomies Organizing The Mission To …Homeless Prenatal Program Inc — $65,609 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program IncSF New Deal — $235,432 · Human ServicesSF New DealEpiscopal Community Services — $61,587 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Comm…SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $40,860 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST COMM…ASIANWEEK FOUNDATION — $33,038 · Human ServicesASIANWEEK FOUN…FARMING HOPE — $348,008 · EmploymentFARMING HOPECHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA — $305,533 · Arts & CultureCHAVALOS DE…3RD STREET YOUTH CENTER AND CLINIC — $41,525 · Youth DevelopmentHeat of the Kitchen — $6,005 · Youth DevelopmentOUR KIDS FIRST EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM — $45,627 · Recreation & SportsBAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT COMMUNITY ADVOCATES INC — $37,440 · Community Improvement
Other$892,423Health$841,222Human Services$370,917Employment$348,008Arts & Culture$305,533Youth Development$47,530Recreation & Sports$45,627Community Improvement$37,440

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHomies Organizing The Mission To Empower Youth HOMEY — $775,613 over 2y, 54% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $428,391 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFARMING HOPE — $348,008 over 2y, 13% of budgetCHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA — $305,533 over 2y, 88% of budgetSF New Deal — $235,432 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $65,609 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $61,587 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASIANWEEK FOUNDATION — $33,038 over 3y, 25% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Extrafood · Crankstart Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Public Health Institute · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Francisco Market Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph