Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sampson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$155kEducation$133kPublic Benefit$77kArts & Culture$56kReligion$54kHealth$24kHuman Services$15kInternational$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$294k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
CITY OF BUFFALO LAKE$37,092
HECTOR HISTORICAL CENTER$25,000
THE BLHS FOUNDATION$10,000
FIRST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
ZION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
THOMAS A COSTELLO LEGACY FD$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ALLISON DORNSEIF CENTRAL LAKES COLL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COMMON CUP MINISTRY: $100 → 7%THIS OLD HORSE: $1k → 6%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%SHARING CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
MA
SD
IA
CA
VA
AZ
NC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$227k · 32 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
103

Total granted

$227k
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+2%

Still filing today

34%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $186k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +16%
  • RC
    RENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +13%
  • SA
    SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LB
    LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +130%
  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • RU
    RASMUSSEN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tc Food Justice

Tc food justice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in minneapolis, mn. since march 2016 we have been working with co-ops, grocery stores, and farmers markets to redistribute their unsellable foods to local hunger relief…

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Emergency Service Inc

Community emergency service (ces) is one of the largest food distribution nonprofits serving one of the poorest communities in the twin cities. our mission is to turn hunger into hope through three principal programs: (i) food market, (ii)…

Human Services
3
A Touch of the Father's Love Inc

The mission of a touch of the fathers love food pantry and ministry is to: ~alleviate food insecurity in the twin counties area through the distribution of healthy and nutritious food while instilling hope. ~treat all staff, partner…

Human Services
4
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
5
Union Gospel Mission Association of St Paul Inc

We provide christ-centered, life-changing pathways for all people who are experiencing homelessness, hunger and addiction.

Human Services
6
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
7
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Wisconsin Inc

The mission of goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill") is: connecting people to work. preparing people for life. goodwill is dedicated to creating collective community impact through (continued on schedule o)

Employment
8
St John the Evangelist Homeless Shelter Inc

To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.

Housing & Shelter
9
Trust Inc

Services for residents in area.

Human Services
10
Open Arms of Minnesota

By providing food and medicine, we nourish our clients and build community

Human Services
11
Awakening to God Ministries

Awakening to god ministries (atg) provides love, comfort and hope to people who are suffering in the u.s. and around the world by providing spiritual, physical, mental and emotional solutions. in fiscal year 2024, atg partnered with prayer…

Religion
12
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas a Costello Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF BUFFALO LAKE: $77,092 · OtherCITY OF BUFFALO LAKEHECTOR HISTORICAL CENTER: $51,000 · OtherHECTOR HISTORICAL CENTER+127 more: $239,275 · Other+127 moreLOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $10,173 · HealthREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $2,000 · HealthCHANGING GAITS INC: $1,000 · HealthJOE WAS JUST JOE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthTHOMAS A COSTELLO LEGACY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · PhilanthropyPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyROTARY LIGHTS INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropySHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHIS OLD HORSE INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionTHE CAUSE INC: $1,500 · ReligionMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWELLS ACADEMY INC: $1,000 · EmploymentFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $700 · International
Other$517,367Health$14,173Philanthropy$13,500Human Services$5,100Religion$3,500Arts & Culture$3,000Employment$1,000International$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $10,173 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHOMAS A COSTELLO LEGACY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF: $4,300 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAUSE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY LIGHTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLS ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHANGING GAITS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHIS OLD HORSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CUP MINISTRY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS A COSTELLO LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA MARINE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds REVERENCE FOR LIFE AND CONCERN FOR PEOPLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sampson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sampson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sampson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph