· Private foundation
Sam Price Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $466k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jewish Community Foundation | $80,000 |
| Scripps Health Foundation | $50,000 |
| YMCA of the Rockies | $35,000 |
| Sharp HealthCare Foundation | $30,000 |
| Harvesters | $30,000 |
| Gift of Life Inc | $30,000 |
| Kansas Public Radio | $25,000 |
| Boulder Hospice Foundation | $25,000 |
| The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation | $25,000 |
| Seven Fires Corporation | $20,000 |
| CATESOL Education Foundation | $20,000 |
| Humane Society of Greater KC | $20,000 |
| Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center | $20,000 |
| Pikes Peak Hospice Pallative Care | $15,790 |
| American Cancer Society Hope Lodge | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
48 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSharp Healthcare Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +34%
YMCA OF THE ROCKIES6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +111%- SHSCRIPPS HEALTH6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -4%
- BLBLOC LIFE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +390%
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.
To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.
As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Seven Fires Coporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sharp Healthcare Foundation ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC ↗
- Who funds KVC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds WAYSIDE WAIFS INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds The San Diego College of Continuing Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO FELINE FOSTER RESCUE ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME INNOVATIONS ↗
- Who funds SAFE LANDING TB HORSE RESCUE AND SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds Citizen-Powered Media ↗
- Who funds BLOC LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds Institute for Jewish & Community Research DBA Bechol Lashon ↗
- Who funds EYE OF THE STORM BOOSTER CLUB ↗
- Who funds City Union Mission ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Servant Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sam Price Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.