How much did Sally Goldman Foundation Inc grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of Sally Goldman Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

jews worldwidedoctorsfostermuseummiamilibraryassists

2021

jewish studentsremembrancemiamiautismlibraryfoodeducation

2022

rescuewildlifecancer research

2023

underprivelagedrescuewildlife

2024

environmental awarenesscancer research

2025

victimsprotectterrorawarenessunderprivelagedscholarshipsrefugees

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k56 grants · $140k
$10k–50k2 grants · $26k

$2,084

Median grant

States reached

$4.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

Broward Partnership for the Homeless$15,784
Weitzman Institute$10,000
Alzheimer's Disease Research$7,866
Women in Distress$7,500
Israel Tennis Centers Foundation$5,750
Addison Reserve Foundation$5,563
Boca Raton Jewish Film Festival$5,357
Heartbeats for Patches$5,271
Anti Defamation League$5,195
UF Hillel$5,150
Broward Health Foundation$5,150
Broward Performing Arts Foundation$5,150
Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation$5,000
B the Difference$5,000
Prostate Cancer Foundation$3,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$607k · 67 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

67 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$607k

$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%

+49%

Still filing today

37%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BP
Broward Partnership for the Homeless
6× · 2020–2025 · $86k · revenue +111%
BR
Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation
4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +34%
HF
Heartbeats for Patches
4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +263%

Funded once

CF
Chabad FSU
one grant, 2021 · $10k
S
Shadowlight
one grant, 2021 · $8k
NA
NSU Art Museum
one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County

To strengthen jewish identity, energize the relationship with israel and meeting human needs that are uniquely the obligation of the jewish community.

Philanthropy

Bronstein Family Foundation

Philanthropy

The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc

Philanthropy

Jewish Community Foundation of

Philanthropic asset management and grantmaking to both jewish and secular charitable organizations.

Philanthropy

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

To mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity values and shared purpose (see schedule o for continuation)

Philanthropy

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center.it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Foundation for Jewish

The organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks, accepts,…

Philanthropy

United Israel Appeal Inc

Uia is responsible for the allocation and oversight of funds raised by the united states jewish federation campaigns expended in israel by the jewish agency for israel.

International

Jewish Fertility Foundation Inc

The jewish fertility foundation (jff) engages hopeful parents by providing financial assistance, emotional support, and infertility education to those struggling to build their families.

Health

The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive is a national organization dedicated to collecting and promoting the extraordinary stories of jewish women. jwa explores the past as a framework for understanding the issues important to women today; inspires…

Arts & Culture

Jewish Food Society Inc

Jewish food society is a non-profit organization that works to preserve, celebrate, and revitalize jewish culinary heritage from around the world in order to provide a deeper connection to jewish life and identity. we showcase the…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish World Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%2/52

the rest of the field

14%

14,579/102,992

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

48/50

Grantees still filing

37/50

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$528,897Housing & Shelter$87,339Human Services$38,918Civil Rights$31,575International$31,510Community Improvement$20,000Youth Development$15,531

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · United Jewish Community of Broward · Bbx Capital Foundation Inc · Making Change · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Fjc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Sally Goldman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

14get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Heartbeats for Patches.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 831148780 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Heartbeats for Patches, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sally Goldman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sally Goldman Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Sally Goldman Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sally Goldman Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

Sally Goldman Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sally Goldman Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph