Skip to content
Saint Agnes Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$15MHousing & Shelter$692kHuman Services$529kEducation$133kCommunity Improvement$93kYouth Development$33kArts & Culture$10kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $342,843, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,251,493 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $908,650 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$335,343
Median grant
1
States reached
$586M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRESNO$335,343
SANTE HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $560k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $26k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $21k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $17k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $15k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $12k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $11k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $10k → 19%FRESNO METRO MINISTRY: $195k → 19%FRESNO METRO MINISTRY: $151k → 19%FRESNO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $27k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $20k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $25k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $10k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 21 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$16M
$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+22%

Still filing today

95%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAINT AGNES MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8.8M · revenue +106%
  • TH
    TRINITY HOME HEALTH SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5.3M · revenue +84%
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $408k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • CLINICA SIERRA VISTAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +88%
  • CH
    CAMARENA HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +135%
  • SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
2
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
3
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
4
Family Healthcare Network

To provide health care services to socially and economically distressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.

Health
5
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn
Philanthropy
8
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Community Health Partners

Community health partners' mission is to build the valley's premier integrated healthcare delivery system that reliably meets the healthcare needs of our region while exceeding patient expectations.

Health
10
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
11
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Communicare Health Centers

Communicare health center's mission is rooted in the underlying philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege. our mission is characterized by the following commitments: (i) we provide comprehensive and high-quality health care…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinica Sierra Vista; the most unlike its peers is Medical Ministries International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $8,795,046 · HealthSAINT AGNES MEDICAL FOUNDATIONTRINITY HOME HEALTH SERVICES: $5,261,793 · HealthTRINITY HOME HEALTH SERVICES+13 more: $846,788 · Health+13 moreHOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRESNO: $570,343 · OtherCENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCE: $37,000 · OtherYouth Leadership Institute: $22,500 · Other+5 more: $31,500 · OtherFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $372,491 · Human ServicesEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $78,349 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno: $48,000 · Human ServicesFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $30,700 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $408,250 · EducationCPE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $96,660 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS: $25,000 · EducationPoverello House: $77,026 · Housing & ShelterOne Fresno Foundation: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterSAINTS REST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEV: $25,000 · Community ImprovementBlack Wellness & Prosperity Center: $5,000 · Community ImprovementThe Fresno Philharmonic Association: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$14,903,627Other$661,343Human Services$559,540Education$529,910Housing & Shelter$122,026Community Improvement$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT AGNES MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $8,795,046 over 2y, 13% of budgetTRINITY HOME HEALTH SERVICES: $5,261,793 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $408,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWESTCARE CALIFORNIA INC: $375,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $372,491 over 3y, 11% of budgetCLINICA SIERRA VISTA: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMARENA HEALTH: $125,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCPE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $96,660 over 2y, 39% of budgetCalifornia Health Collaborative: $91,357 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $78,349 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetPoverello House: $77,026 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno: $48,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOne Fresno Foundation: $45,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCE: $37,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $30,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: $26,431 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINTS REST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEV: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS: $25,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetYouth Leadership Institute: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArt of Life Cancer Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetThe Fresno Philharmonic Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRESNO POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESNO-MADERA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlack Wellness & Prosperity Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHMONG NURSES ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCentral Valley Black Nurses Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Fresno Community Hosp…The California Endowm…Educational Employees…Central California Fo…Sierra Health Foundat…The Edward M and Jean…The James Irvine Foun…Community Hospitals o…East Bay Community Fo…Valley Children's Hos…Gl Bruno Family Found…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA39× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center · The California Endowment · Educational Employees Credit Union · Central California Food Bank · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The Edward M and Jeanne C Kashian Family Foundation Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · Community Hospitals of Central California · East Bay Community Foundation · Valley Children's Hospital · Gl Bruno Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saint Agnes Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saint Agnes Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saint Agnes Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home