· Public charity
Community Hospitals of Central California
Mission - why we exist (our purpose) community health system exists to better the lives of all those we serve.vision - what we aspire to achieve we will be the trusted health leader opening new doors to educate innovate and expand our care and services across the valley.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VALLEY HEALTHCARE EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $9,360 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $296k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of Community Hospitals of Central California’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 78% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFresno Metropolitan Ministry3× · 2019–2021 · $275k · revenue +229%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS2× · 2018–2019 · $200k · revenue +142%
- AAAdvance Armenia Foundation2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +146% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- FFMAAAone grant, 2018 · $319k
- FRFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $51k · revenue +137%
- CCCENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCEone grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…
To build a culture of philanthropy by harnessing the expertise and passion of our alumni, parents, and friends to raise private support for the education, practical research, and public service that transforms the lives of our students,…
Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve
Agricultural education at california state university, fresno.
The auxiliary organization was formed to operate and manage division i intercollegiate athletic programs at california state university, fresno.
To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
Chccf exists to better the lives of all those we serve.
The Central Valley Health Foundation (CVHF) is a California not-for-profit corporation. The Foundation was organized to coordinate the solicitation of contributions through its operations and to disburse such contributions, earnings, and…
The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundation Fcoe Inc and the most unlike its peers is Advance Armenia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fresno Metropolitan Ministry ↗
- Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Advance Armenia Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FCOE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds THE BULLDOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fresno Chamber of Commerce GREATER FRESNO AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CPE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY HEALTHCARE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center · Saint Agnes Medical Center · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Valley Children's Hospital · The Saladino Family Foundation · Shamshoian Family Foundation · Educational Employees Credit Union · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Hospitals of Central California funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.