Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sabatino Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$114kHealth$92kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$28kEducation$26kRecreation & Sports$8kPhilanthropy$6kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$326k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$19,831
GOOD SHEPHERD$17,500
ST JOSEPHS PERUVIAN MISSION FUND$5,000
15 AND THE MAHOMIES FOUNDATION$5,000
SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES$4,548
ST JUDE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $9k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $3k → 14%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 5%SHAWNEE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NV
IA
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
KS
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 13 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
32

Total granted

$275k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+55%

Still filing today

31%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $82k · revenue +29%
  • CK
    Camp Kesem National
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • OC
    ONE COMMUNITY JIUJITSU
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • UT
    UNICORN THEATRE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
Care Beyond the Boulevard Inc

Care Beyond the Boulevard (CBB) provides quality medical care, case management, and respite services to the homeless, uninsured, and vulnerable people of Greater Kansas City.

Health
4
Refuge Kc Inc

We exist to welcome our new-American neighbors with Gospel-focused ministries of mercy so they might know, love, and follow Jesus into His Kingdom

Religion
5
Catholic Community Hospice of Northeast Kansas Inc

The organization provides hospice care services within the archdiocese of kansas city in kansas as well as the greater metropolitan areas of kansas city, kansas and kansas city, missouri.

—
6
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
7
Columbus Children's Foundation

Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.

Health
8
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
9
Christian Family Counseling Center

The mission of the Christian family counseling center is to restore, educate, and strengthen people through professional mental health services that integrate a gracious Christian perspective wtih psychological principles, striving to help…

Human Services
10
Central Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates

Provides a voice for abused and neglected children who are under the legal protection of the court system

Civil Rights
11
Cristo Rey Kansas City Sisters of Chari Ty of Leavenworth High School

The organization provides a catholic college preparatory education to culturally diverse students with economic need.

—
12
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Center of Shawnee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benedictine College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SHEPHERD: $57,222 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERDGOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH: $23,269 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEARNING CLUB: $12,950 · OtherLEARNING CLUBAZTEC THEATER: $12,305 · OtherAZTEC THEATERGOOD SHEPARD CHURCH: $10,165 · OtherMUSIC MOVEMENT: $7,125 · OtherONE COMMUNITY JIUJITSU: $6,950 · Other+30 more: $62,224 · Other+30 moreCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $82,296 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIO…+1 more: $515 · HealthCommunity Center of Shawnee Inc: $39,691 · Human ServicesCommunity Center…Camp Kesem National: $12,150 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem Natio…ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION: $7,500 · InternationalUNICORN THEATRE: $5,803 · Arts & Culture15 AND THE MAHOMIES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBenedictine College: $2,500 · EducationRESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $370 · Housing & Shelter
Other$207,210Health$82,811Human Services$51,841International$7,500Arts & Culture$5,803Youth Development$5,000Education$2,500Housing & Shelter$370

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $82,296 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Center of Shawnee Inc: $39,691 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $12,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNICORN THEATRE: $5,803 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBenedictine College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGratia Plena: $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $370 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Center of Shawnee Inc ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UNICORN THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds 15 AND THE MAHOMIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds Gratia Plena ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sabatino Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sabatino Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sabatino Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sabatino Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sabatino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph