Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative

Advocacy on the opioid crisis and substance abuse disorders

$40k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.

Health$2.4MCrime & Legal$46kPublic Benefit$40kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$25kEducation$15kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$14kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANGE ADVOCACY$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW MEXICO VETERANS INTEGRATION CENTERS: $10k → 14%CENTRAL FLORIDA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $6k → 13%COMMUNITY COALITION ALLIANCE INC: $20k → 14%HEALTHY COMMUNITIES COALITION: $5k → 8%SHANGRI-LA CORPORATION: $10k → 14%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $25k → 12%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $5k → 10%BELOVED COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $8k → 19%NONVIOLENCE WORKS INCTAOS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $10k → 18%AVENUES EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES INC: $10k → 32%DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL: $5k → 10%SHANGRI-LA CORPORATION: $7k → 14%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $25k → 12%AVIVO: $14k → 11%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $25k → 12%MAINE RECOVERY FUND: $10k → 7%AVIVO: $9k → 11%NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS- WASHINGTON: $20k → 9%NAMI - WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 17 repeat orgs$612k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
74

Total granted

$2.0M
$612k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+44%

Still filing today

94%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CADCA
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +21%
  • YP
    YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +42%
  • GA
    GRANGE ADVOCACY INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $55k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • MR
    MINNESOTA RETAILERS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +46%
  • IS
    INDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +7%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COALITION ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +170%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for Addiction and Mental Health Services- Maine

The Alliance represents its members in advancing prevention, treatment and recovery-oriented systems of care for mental illness and substance use disorder through advocacy, leadership, and professional development.

—
2
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
3
North Range Behavioral Health

North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

Health
4
National Alliance of Methadone Advocates Inc

The primary objective of national alliance of methadone advocates (nama) is to advocate for the patient in treatment by destigmatizing and empowering medication assisted treatment patients. first and foremost, nama recovery confronts the…

—
5
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors

The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) is organized to reflect and advocate for the collective interest of state mental health authorities and their directors at the national level. NASMHPD analyzes…

Health
6
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
7
Mental Health Association of Ne

We assist individuals living with mental health and/or substance use issues to gain and maintain their recovery through: intentional peer support, offering informed choices, advocating, promoting wellness, and encouraging hope throughout…

Health
8
Anuvia Prevention and Recovery Center Inc

We Restore, We Empower, We rise together.

—
9
National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers Corporation

To provide leadership, advocacy, training, and member support services to ensure the availability and highest quality of addiction treatment.

—
10
National Council of Alcoholism & Drug

The Maryland Chapter of the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence is a statewide organization that works to influence public and private policies on addiction, treatment and recovery, reduce the stigma associated with the…

Health
11
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
12
National Council On Alcoholism and Drug Dependencewestchester Inc

The mission of the council is to provide information, education, prevention and referrals. thier goal is to educate the public regarding the treatment and prevention of the disease of alcoholism and chemical dependency and to help…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Out Front Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportYmca Youth DevelopmentFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesYouth Development CentersCommunity Food PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…United Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr18%27%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr15%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%61%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr15%5%35–55yr15%7%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 61% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/93
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,375

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
32
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/90
Grantees still filing
72/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CADCA — $1,515,000 · Youth DevelopmentCADCA+6 more — $68,000 · Youth DevelopmentMINNESOTA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · OtherMINNESOTA RETAIL…Washington Recovery Alliance — $27,000 · OtherWashington Recov…Minnesota Foundation For Agriculture — $26,000 · OtherMinnesota Founda…North Country Serenity Center — $25,000 · OtherNorth Country Se…INDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · OtherINDIANA STATE ME…URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $22,500 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF …Envision You — $17,500 · OtherDISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $30,000 · OtherDISMAS HOME OF N…COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $14,000 · Other+27 more — $173,300 · Other+27 moreYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY — $75,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG PEOP…NAMI WASHINGTON — $29,500 · Human ServicesNAMI WASHI…AVIVO — $23,000 · Human ServicesAVIVOCOMMUNITY COALITION ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …SHANGRI-LA CORPORATION — $16,500 · Human ServicesSHANGRI-LA…AVENUES EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO VETERANS INTEGRATION CENTERS — $10,000 · Human ServicesNONVIOLENCE WORKS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesUnited Recovery Fund — $10,000 · Human Services+5 more — $28,000 · Human Services+5 morePORTLAND RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER — $28,200 · HealthNAMI MAINE — $18,000 · HealthWESTERN MAINE ADDICTION RECOVERY INITIATIVE — $15,000 · HealthHEALING ADDICTION IN OUR COMMUNITY- HAC — $15,000 · HealthAMADOR HEALTH CENTER INC — $13,500 · HealthSAN JUAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $10,000 · HealthSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthRIO GRANDE ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT PROGRAM — $10,000 · HealthGUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC — $10,000 · HealthHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS — $10,000 · HealthPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC — $8,000 · HealthPathway to Recovery Inc — $7,500 · Health+9 more — $47,000 · HealthSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyOHIO ASSOC CNTY BEHAVIORAL HLTH AUTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Philanthropy4th Dimension Sobriety Inc — $7,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL BLUEGRASS MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED LABOR AGENCY OF NEVADA INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyGRANGE ADVOCACY INC — $55,000 · Food & NutritionLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $10,000 · Food & NutritionYUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $5,000 · Food & NutritionWellness Council of Indiana Inc — $15,000 · EducationOUT FRONT FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationMARYLAND RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $10,375 · EducationCENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION — $10,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $6,500 · Education
Youth Development$1,583,000Other$390,300Human Services$232,000Health$202,200Philanthropy$73,000Food & Nutrition$70,000Education$66,875

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCADCA — $1,515,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY — $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGRANGE ADVOCACY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetREALITY CHECK INC — $35,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetMINNESOTA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetDISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNAMI WASHINGTON — $29,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPORTLAND RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER — $28,200 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWashington Recovery Alliance — $27,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMinnesota Foundation For Agriculture — $26,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAVIVO — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNAMI MAINE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEnvision You — $17,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSHANGRI-LA CORPORATION — $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWellness Council of Indiana Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOUT FRONT FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHEALING ADDICTION IN OUR COMMUNITY- HAC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMADOR HEALTH CENTER INC — $13,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARYLAND RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $10,375 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSAN JUAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAVENUES EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTRUSTED MENTORS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BASEBALL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSober Apartment Living CO — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRIO GRANDE ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO VETERANS INTEGRATION CENTERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget365 HEALTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH INNOVATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNONVIOLENCE WORKS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Recovery Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC — $8,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBELOVED COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION — $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPathway to Recovery Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget4th Dimension Sobriety Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE LIFE LINK — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Con Alma Health Found…Santa Fe Community Fo…Maine Health Access F…The Molina Healthcare…NAMI NationalThe Colorado Health F…Enterprise Holdings F…The Collins FoundationCh Robinson Worldwide…Amg Charitable Gift F…Wells Fargo Foundation
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC26.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation · NAMI National · The Colorado Health Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Shangri-La Corporation — 68% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
  • Youth Empowerment Source Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
  • Nami Oregon — 10% of income from government
  • Community Coalition Alliance Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Beloved Community Services Corporation — 3% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative?

Find your warmest path to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home