How much did RX ABUSE LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE grant in FY2023?

Youth Development$1.6MHuman Services$232kHealth$202kPhilanthropy$73kFood & Nutrition$70kEducation$67kCrime & Legal$56kHousing & Shelter$14kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$310k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

addressing currenteducationrecoveryrali

2021

addressing current

2022

addressing current

2023

rural small

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

GRANGE ADVOCACY$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.0M · 17 repeat orgs$657k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

$657k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+76%

Still filing today

94%

95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
COMMUNITY ANTI-DRUG COALITIONS OF AMERICA
3× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +26%
YP
YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY
3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +58%
GA
GRANGE ADVOCACY
2× · 2020–2023 · $55k · revenue +230%

Funded once

MR
MINNESOTA RETAILERS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +44%
IS
INDIANA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +19%
SF
SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Wellness Collective

mental health, drug abuse support

Health

North Range Behavioral Health

North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

Health

Mental Health Minnesota

Mental Health Minnesota is the voice of lived mental health expenience. We carry that declaration forward as we work to advance mental health and well-being for all, increase access to mental health treatment and services, and provide…

Health

Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—

Nh Alcohol & Drug Abuse Counselors Association

The Association supports the substance use prevention treatment and recovery workforce by providing training and scholarships, promoting wellbeing and supporting licensure of qualified professionals. These activities ar

Unclassified

National Council of Alcoholism & Drug

Advocacy - Drug Addiction Services.

Health

Anchorage Community Mental Health

To promote recovery and wellness by providing consumer-driven behavioral healthcare services.

Health

Cascadia Health

Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.

Health

Consumer Action Network

Consumer Advocate Network CAN empowers mental health and substance abuse consumers by promoting recovery and self-advocacy.

Education

New Hampshire Coalition of Recovery Residences

Promote the recovery of individuals with substance use disorders in the state of New Hampshire by certifying that recovery houses operate according to nationally accepted standards.

Health

Mental Health Association of Ne

We assist individuals living with mental health and/or substance use issues to gain and maintain their recovery through: intentional peer support, offering informed choices, advocating, promoting wellness, and encouraging hope throughout…

Health

Central East Alcoholism & Drug

Central east alcoholism and drug council is a community-based nonprofit treatment and prevention program with a full continuum of care for drug and alcohol dependence and abuse.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Recovery Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Out Front Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 61% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/93

the rest of the field

11%

5,477/50,375

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

88/90

Grantees still filing

76/90

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Youth Development$1,583,000Other$390,300Human Services$232,000Health$202,200Philanthropy$73,000Food & Nutrition$70,000Education$66,875

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC31.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · NAMI National · Maine Health Access Foundation Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RX ABUSE LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OUT FRONT FOUNDATION LLC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 820873743 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OUT FRONT FOUNDATION LLC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative?

Find your warmest path to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RX ABUSE LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative?

More from the funding graph

RX ABUSE LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rx Abuse Leadership Initiative?

More from the funding graph