· Public charity
NAMI National
NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.See Schedule O
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 111 grants below total $2,189,829 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,411,561 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $221,732 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $288k
- $10k–50k64 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k8 grants · $777k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAMI Greater Wheeling | $154,250 |
| NAMI Georgia | $131,000 |
| NAMI Texas | $114,583 |
| NAMI Montana | $100,000 |
| Morgan State University | $75,000 |
| NAMI Westside Los Angeles | $73,000 |
| NAMI Ohio | $67,500 |
| NAMI Greater Los Angeles County | $61,549 |
| NAMI Keystone Pennsylvania | $41,750 |
| NAMI Illinois | $34,667 |
| NAMI Yakima | $33,450 |
| NAMI Missouri | $31,250 |
| NAMI St Louis | $28,750 |
| NAMI Colorado | $28,000 |
| NAMI North Texas | $27,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $789k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
135 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $282k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NTNAMI Texas Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +118%
- NGNAMI Georgia Inc6× · 2018–2025 · $328k · revenue +119%
- NKNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA6× · 2020–2025 · $310k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- MHMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
- GWGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +3%
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We represent a community of people who are committed to relieving the pain and suffering of families and peers whose lives are impacted by a Mental Health Condition. The NAMI approach has been proven to work across the United States! NAMI…
Nami is a tri-county voice for mental illness. it builds a community of hope for those with mental illness and their families, thru support, education and advocacy.
The national alliance on mental illness (nami) is the nation's largest grassroots mental health organization, established in 1979 for mental health clients and their families as a self-help organization dedicated to providing support,…
Nami provides advocacy, education, support, public awareness so all affected by mental illness can live better lives.
Nami geauga county (nami) is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization incorporated in 2007 to provide support, education, and advocacy for individuals and their families, friends, and communities affected by serious mental illness.
NAMI Monterey County provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.
Our mission is to provide information, understanding, education, and support for persons experiencing mental illness and their families. We are an all volunteer organization that provides its services and information materials free of…
Nami of san joaquin county provides education, support and advocacy to families and individuals whose lives have been affected by serious mental illness.to promote wellness, recovery, and resiliance through support, education and advocacy.
NAMI provides advocacy, education, support and public awareness so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness can build better lives.See Schedule O
NAMI Sonoma County's mission is to build better lives for individuals and families affected by mental illness throughout Sonoma County by providing education, support, and advocacy.
NAMI Amador is a grassroots, family and consumer self-help support and advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of people with severe mental illnesses, i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (manic depression), clinical…
To provide education, support and advocate for individuals and families living with mental illness as well as increase public awareness and understanding of mental health.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nami Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
183 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 183 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAMI Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI Georgia Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds NAMI GREATER HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds NAMI WESTSIDE LA ↗
- Who funds NAMI NORTHSIDE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds NAMI COLORADO ↗
- Who funds NAMI METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds NAMI MONTANA ↗
- Who funds NAMI MONTGOMERTY COUNTY (MD) INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI-NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI California ↗
- Who funds NAMI TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds NAMI ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Nami Treasure Coast Fl Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI MULTNOMAH ↗
- Who funds NAMI WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF SOUTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds NAMI KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI Alaska ↗
- Who funds NAMI NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds NAMI Mercer NJ Inc ↗
- Who funds NAMI Seattle ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI-NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds NAMI OREGON ↗
- Who funds NAMI - VIRGINIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Nami Washington · NAMI California · Chc Creating Healthier Communities · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Suncoast Credit Union · Nami Illinois Inc · The Molina Healthcare Charitable Foundation · Nami Keystone Pennsylvania · Kebok Foundation Agency · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Point32health Foundation Inc · The Margaret Clark Morgan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization NAMI National funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nami Multnomah — 16% of income from government
- Nami Oregon — 10% of income from government
- The Morgan State University Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
- Nami Greater Orlando Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.