Skip to content
Rug & Home Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Rug & Home Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$200kHuman Services$43kInternational$16kEducation$14kCivil Rights$9kReligion$5kArts & Culture$5kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORY CARE$25,000
CENTER FOR CONSCIOUS LIVING & DYING$25,000
NCIAP$6,000
VETERANS HEALING FARM$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HELPMATE: $2k → 12%CENTER FOR CONSCIOUS LIVING & DYING: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$138k · 7 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
24

Total granted

$138k
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
-3%

Still filing today

14%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MemoryCare Inc
    4× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +68%
  • N
    NCIAP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k
  • NP
    NCIAP PEOPLES MEDICAL CARE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $8k

Funded once

  • SG
    SELAH GRACE HENDERSON RAFFLE
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • PH
    PARDEE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kiran

Kiran's mission is to end the cycle of abuse and to serve and empower South Asian victims of domestic violence in North Carolina by providing cultually specific services and comprehensive economic, social and community resources.

Crime & Legal
2
Carolina Comfort Coalition

Serenity House is a community organization that bridges the gap for hospice families by providing a three bed group home setting at no charge for short term end of life care by trained volunteers and nurses.

—
3
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

—
4
Heart of Georgia Hospice Inc

Provide hospice care and support to terminal patients as well as their families.

Human Services
5
Virginia B Andes Volunteer Community Clinic Inc

Provide no-cost volunteer medical, pharmacy and wellness services to the under-served in charlotte county

Health
6
Richmond County Hospice Inc

Mission is to comfort the body and heal the heart through compassionate quality care during end-of-life experiences, so patients and families may live each day with peace, comfort and dignity. we also serve the community by providing…

Human Services
7
Heroes Center Inc

Operation Next Step | Vet 2 Vet | Welcome Home missions. Please see our website for further information.

Human Services
8
Rva Hospice Llc

Kirva Hospice is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing excellence in care to our patients, families, and care givers in the greater Richmond area. Kirva Hospice is built on the philosophy of care that is deeply rooted in the…

Human Services
9
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
10
Viju & Asha Charitable Foundation
—
11
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
12
Raksha Inc

Raksha - meaning "protection" in serveral south asian languages - is a georgia-based nonprofit organization for the south asian american community. raksha's mission is to promote a stronger and healthier south asian community through…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bullington Gardens Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yuvaan Tiwari Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SELAH GRACE HENDERSON RAFFLE: $28,682 · OtherSELAH GRACE HENDERSON RAFFLEIndividual grant recipient: $28,472 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARDEE HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherPARDEE HOSPITALNCIAP: $14,000 · OtherNCIAPMYNA MAHILE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherMYNA MAHILE FOUNDATIONNCIAP PEOPLES MEDICAL CARE: $7,500 · OtherFOUR SEASONS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherIndia Associate of Greenville: $6,000 · Other+16 more: $23,050 · Other+16 moreMemoryCare Inc: $100,000 · HealthMemoryCare IncYUVAAN TIWARI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthYUVAAN TIWARI FOUNDATION INCCenter for Conscious Living & Dying: $25,000 · Human ServicesCenter fo…HELPMATE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesHELPMATE …VISION EXPRESS INC: $10,000 · InternationalINDIA ASSOCIATION OF GREENVILLEINC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureVAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBULLINGTON GARDENS INC: $5,000 · EmploymentVeterans Healing Farm: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$150,204Health$110,000Human Services$26,500International$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Employment$5,000Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMemoryCare Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetYUVAAN TIWARI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVISION EXPRESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetINDIA ASSOCIATION OF GREENVILLEINC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBULLINGTON GARDENS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVeterans Healing Farm: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProverbs 226: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHELPMATE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HENDERSONVILLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSTAR FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MemoryCare Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Conscious Living & Dying ↗
  • Who funds YUVAAN TIWARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION EXPRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA ASSOCIATION OF GREENVILLEINC ↗
  • Who funds BULLINGTON GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds VAGABOND SCHOOL OF THE DRAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Healing Farm ↗
  • Who funds Proverbs 226 ↗
  • Who funds HELPMATE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HENDERSONVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSTAR FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Dogwood Health TrustThe Cannon Foundation…The Community Foundat…Walnut Cove Members A…Duke Energy FoundationThe Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Community Foundation of Henderson County IncNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Henderson County Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Walnut Cove Members Association Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rug & Home Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rug & Home Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rug & Home Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rug & Home Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rug & Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home