Skip to content
Rotary District 5000 Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary District 5000 Foundation

Youth education, community welfare and support.

$599k
Granted FY2026still arriving
16
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$1.0MHousing & Shelter$409kHuman Services$370kEnvironment$324kHealth$296kCommunity Improvement$233kInternational$199kFood & Nutrition$110kOther$0
02FY2026 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $586,241, the rows itemized in this filing. The $598,814 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,573 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $266k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
$26,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$621k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lahaina Community Land Trust$150,000
Na Koa Manu Conservation$103,000
Wisdom Circles Oceania$57,250
Maui Grassroots Collective$44,000
Teran James Young Foundation$40,000
Imua Onipa'a$30,000
Maui Academy of Performing Arts$27,900
Maui Nui Marine Resource Council$26,000
Maui Prepatory Academy$24,080
Aloha Amplified$23,424
Pukalani Nazarene Cmty Village$15,000
Sacred Hearts School$15,000
The Rotary Foundation$10,587
Maui Humane Society$10,000
Lahainaluna HS Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Maui Family YMCA: $250k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$589k · 5 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
44

Total granted

$589k
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $552k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNSET FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $324k · 77% of their budget
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNRISE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · 42% of their budget
  • MP
    MAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    2× · 2025–2026 · $48k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • AR
    ALOHA RANCH INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $303k
  • MF
    MAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $250k · revenue +98%
  • MK
    MALAMA KULA
    one grant, 2025 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
2
Malama Kua Aina
Environment
3
Kaiaulu Initiatives

Kaiaulu initiatives is regreening and rebuilding lahaina one tree and one person at a time through education, training, community networking & sustainability while incorporating hawaiian cultural practices.

Environment
4
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
5
Na Mamo o Kawa

to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.

Environment
6
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
7
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
8
Na 'Aina Kai Botanical Gardens
Philanthropy
9
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
10
Na Kua Aina O Waimanalo
Arts & Culture
11
Aloha Foundation
—
12
Liliuokalani Trust
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piha Wellness and Healing; the most unlike its peers is Teran James Young Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
17/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNRISE: $149,650 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNRISEIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRotary Club of Kihei Wailea: $104,900 · OtherRotary Club of Kihei WaileaFamily Life Center Inc: $100,005 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherALOHA HOUSE INC: $100,000 · OtherMaui Hero Project Inc: $65,300 · OtherNA KIAI O MAUI: $82,011 · OtherNA KOA MANU CONSERVATION INC: $103,000 · OtherNA KOA MANU CONSERVATION INCTHE SPIRIT HORSE RANCH INC: $96,000 · OtherCOMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE: $90,000 · Other+35 more: $828,178 · Other+35 moreALOHA RANCH INC: $303,179 · Housing & ShelterALOHA RANCH IN…LAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterLAHAINA COMMUN…HomeAid Hawaii: $23,179 · Housing & ShelterROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNSET FOUNDATION: $323,943 · EnvironmentROTARY CLU…MAUI NUI MARINE RESOURCE COUNCIL INC: $26,000 · EnvironmentMAUI NUI M…MALAMA KULA: $200,000 · Community ImprovementKULEANA MICRO-LENDING: $59,500 · Community ImprovementAloha Amplified: $23,424 · Community ImprovementMAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $250,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $185,278 · InternationalHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $15,000 · InternationalMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $48,160 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $47,221 · EducationTERAN JAMES YOUNG FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationImua Onipa'a: $30,000 · EducationLAHAINALUNA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationROTARY INTL DISTRICT 5280 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8,900 · Education
Other$1,924,044Housing & Shelter$476,358Environment$349,943Community Improvement$282,924Human Services$263,000International$200,278Education$184,281

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNSET FOUNDATION: $323,943 over 2y, 77% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $185,278 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF LAHAINA SUNRISE: $149,650 over 2y, 42% of budgetFamily Life Center Inc: $100,005 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALOHA HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPIRIT HORSE RANCH INC: $96,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COLLECTIVE: $90,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetKULEANA MICRO-LENDING: $59,500 over 1y, 47% of budgetRotary Club of Kona: $50,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetPIHA WELLNESS AND HEALING: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetStraub Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAUI PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $48,160 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $47,221 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF HONOLULU: $21,193 over 1y, 20% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY INTL DISTRICT 5280 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8,900 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII KEIKI MUSEUM: $7,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maui United WayFred Baldwin Memorial…Kaiser Foundation Hea…Atherton Family Found…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Maui United WayHI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maui United Way · Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · Atherton Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary District 5000 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary District 5000 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary District 5000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home