· Private foundation
Rossetter Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $204k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUND | $45,000 |
| VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM | $44,000 |
| ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE | $16,000 |
| FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT | $16,000 |
| COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| LEARNING WORKS | $15,000 |
| ARIZONA LAND AND WATER TRUST | $13,000 |
| MAINE NEEDS | $10,000 |
| FULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL | $10,000 |
| PREBLE STREET LEARNING COLLABORATIVE (PSLC) | $8,000 |
| ROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| ISLAND INSTITUTE | $6,000 |
| IN HER PRESENCE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OIOne22 Inc6× · 2019–2025 · $127k · revenue +84%
- SISKY ISLAND ALLIANCE8× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +19%
- ADARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM5× · 2017–2021 · $63k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- LALEWISTON-AUBURN AREA RESPONSE FUNDone grant, 2023 · $20k
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -10%
- SCSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue +75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.
Rocky Mountain Field Institute conserves and protects public lands in Southern Colorado through volunteer-based trail and restoration projects, environmental education, and restoration research.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Maine Farmland Trust protects farmland, supports farmers, and advances the future of farming.
Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Grieving Children and the most unlike its peers is Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds SKY ISLAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LAND AND WATER TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEARNINGWORKS ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTREPID FALLEN HEROES FUND ↗
- Who funds OPEN CITY ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PUEBLO CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Common Good City Farm ↗
- Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FULL CIRCLE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Doug Coombs Foundation ↗
- Who funds WALLKILL VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Maine Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds TETON LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FULL PLATES FULL POTENTIAL ↗
- Who funds CONTINENTAL DIVIDE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Island Institute ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · John T Gorman Foundation · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Denver Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Albert B Glickman Family Foundation · United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rossetter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rossetter Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rossetter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.