Skip to content

· Public charity

Rosemoor Foundation Inc

To provide financial support for a variety of apostolic initiatives, centers and activities whose origin and mission are inspired by the catholic prelature of opus dei.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$19MEducation$4.3MRecreation & Sports$4.0MArts & Culture$3.0MHuman Services$756kYouth Development$181kEmployment$95kInternational$31k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $3,507,214, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,194,592 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $687,378 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $896k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$78,195
Median grant
9
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION$1,100,000
MURRAY HILL PLACE INC$1,004,058
ARNOLD HALL INC$257,615
YUMA CENTER INC$127,776
ALDERTON HOUSE INC$116,330
CLEVEMONT INC$110,970
CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT$108,000
ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE$105,000
LONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC$90,000
SOUTHGATE FOUNDATION$86,392
STONECREST HOME ARTS INC$78,195
EXCEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$73,100
VAN NESS CENTER INC$46,564
SOUTHMORE FOUNDATION INC$44,000
GRANDVUE INC$42,910
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $726k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARWICK STUDY CENTER: $12k → 7%LINDELL STUDY CENTER: $3k → 11%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 14%CHARWICK STUDY CENTER: $12k → 7%ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER: $12k → 14%CHARWICK STUDY CENTER: $12k → 7%ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER: $12k → 14%CHARWICK STUDY CENTER: $12k → 7%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $122k → 14%CHARWICK STUDY CENTER: $12k → 7%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $114k → 14%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $108k → 14%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $97k → 14%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $96k → 14%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $84k → 14%CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
MO
VA
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $490k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$490k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CAPITAL/PROGRAM GRANTS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 27 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$29M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MURRAY HILL PLACE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +42% · 35% of their budget
  • YS
    Yuma Study Center
    7× · 2018–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +3% · 70% of their budget
  • TF
    TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue ×93 · 97% of their budget

Funded once

  • OS
    OAKCREST SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +27%
  • RR
    Roseaire Retreat Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +57%
  • SI
    SHELLBOURNE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arborlea Study Center

We believe women play an integral role in shaping the family, workplaces, and the course of civilization. By accompanying women at every life stage, Arborlea Study Center aims to inspire women to develop personally, professionally and…

Arts & Culture
2
Reston Study Center Inc

Provide classes and mentoring aimed at personal, spiritual and professional development of youths and adults.

Religion
3
Wespine Study Center Inc

Courses in character development, spiritual retreats, courses in roman catholic doctrine, sports and hobby activities for youth, care of facilities for roman catholic worship, educational programs and staff residence. the spiritual…

Religion
4
Menlough Study Center Inc

The mission of the Menlough Study Center Inc is to provide moral intellectual and cultural formation consistant with Judea Christian principles and in cooperation with Opus Dei a personal prelature of the Catholic Church.

Religion
5
Layton Study Center Inc

Cultural and religious (roman catholic) classes, religious retreats, youth programs, individual spiritual direction, care of the chapel used for roman catholic liturgical services and private prayer.

Religion
6
Riverside Study Center Inc

Religious and educational

Religion
7
Trumbull Manor Inc

To promote the intellectual, moral and cultural development of persons of all races, nationalities and creeds.

Unclassified
8
Theresians International Inc

Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.

—
9
Elmbrook Inc

Elmbrook operates a residence for eight people including university students and staff, and it features a Christian living environment, library and chapel. Elmbrook also provides instruction and service opportunities to an additional sixty…

Unclassified
10
Womens Institute of Torah Seminary for Girls

Post High School Education

Education
11
Notre Dame Retreat House Inc

Our mission is to help individuals draw closer to God, grow in faith, and lead lives of purpose. While grounded in the Catholic faith tradition, we welcome all who are seeking sacred space for personal, professional, and spiritual growth.

Religion
12
Darien Study Center Inc

In cooperation with the Roman Catholic Prelature of Opus Dei, Darien Study Center fosters the search for holiness in the middle of the world, by means of ordinary work and all the other circumstances of daily life. See www.opusdei.org.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation for Social and Educational Development; the most unlike its peers is Association for Educational Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
17/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MURRAY HILL PLACE INC: $7,482,548 · ReligionMURRAY HILL PLACE INCStonecrest Home Arts Inc: $2,413,196 · ReligionStonecrest Home Arts IncALDERTON HOUSE INC: $1,092,831 · ReligionALDERTON HOUSE INCArnold Hall Inc: $1,060,412 · ReligionArnold Hall IncLONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $712,159 · ReligionCLEVEMONT INC: $656,508 · Religion+9 more: $1,322,884 · Religion+9 moreOAKCREST SCHOOL: $2,000,000 · EducationOAKCREST SCHOOLAssociation for Educational Development: $1,875,666 · EducationAssociation for…GRANDEVUE STUDY CENTER INC: $233,050 · EducationGRANDEVUE STUDY…+2 more: $175,376 · EducationTRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC: $3,569,174 · OtherTRIMOUNT FOUND…PALMTRAIL INC: $386,620 · OtherPALMTRAIL INC+1 more: $93,850 · OtherYuma Study Center: $3,969,109 · Recreation & SportsYuma Study Cen…ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE INC: $2,990,000 · InternationalASSOCIATION…+1 more: $31,000 · InternationalCORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $639,000 · Human ServicesCharwick Study Center Inc: $60,000 · Human Services+2 more: $26,850 · Human ServicesAster Study Center Inc: $60,000 · Youth Development
Religion$14,740,538Education$4,284,092Other$4,049,644Recreation & Sports$3,969,109International$3,021,000Human Services$725,850Youth Development$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMURRAY HILL PLACE INC: $7,482,548 over 8y, 35% of budgetYuma Study Center: $3,969,109 over 7y, 70% of budgetTRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC: $3,569,174 over 7y, 97% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE INC: $2,990,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetStonecrest Home Arts Inc: $2,413,196 over 8y, 31% of budgetAssociation for Educational Development: $1,875,666 over 7y, 48% of budgetALDERTON HOUSE INC: $1,092,831 over 8y, 40% of budgetArnold Hall Inc: $1,060,412 over 8y, 15% of budgetLONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $712,159 over 8y, 11% of budgetCLEVEMONT INC: $656,508 over 8y, 48% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: $639,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetPALMTRAIL INC: $386,620 over 8y, 17% of budgetSOUTHOLD CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC: $354,700 over 4y, 57% of budgetVANCOURT INC: $353,063 over 4y, 99% of budgetGRANDEVUE STUDY CENTER INC: $233,050 over 7y, 28% of budgetSouthgate Foundation Inc: $158,392 over 3y, 12% of budgetSouthmore Foundation Inc: $128,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetExcel Education Foundation Inc: $121,100 over 5y, 33% of budgetWOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $112,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCEDAR WOOD FOUNDATION INC: $95,445 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetHEIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $93,850 over 4y, 90% of budgetCharwick Study Center Inc: $60,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetAster Study Center Inc: $60,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetRoseaire Retreat Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetVAN NESS STUDY CENTER INC: $56,104 over 2y, 27% of budgetPETAWA RESIDENCE AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $54,276 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN INITIATIVES FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER: $24,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSHELLBOURNE INC: $4,680 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLINDELL STUDY CENTER: $2,850 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MURRAY HILL PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Yuma Study Center ↗
  • Who funds TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Stonecrest Home Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds OAKCREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Association for Educational Development ↗
  • Who funds ALDERTON HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Arnold Hall Inc ↗
  • Who funds LONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVEMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds PALMTRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHOLD CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VANCOURT INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANDEVUE STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Southgate Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southmore Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Excel Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR WOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Charwick Study Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Aster Study Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Roseaire Retreat Inc ↗
  • Who funds VAN NESS STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PETAWA RESIDENCE AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INITIATIVES FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHELLBOURNE INC ↗
  • Who funds LINDELL STUDY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woodlawn FoundationNY28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woodlawn Foundation · Corporation for Social and Educational Development · Co Tua John F Cuneo Jr Fnd · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemoor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemoor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rosemoor Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rosemoor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosemoor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph