· Public charity
Rosemoor Foundation Inc
To provide financial support for a variety of apostolic initiatives, centers and activities whose origin and mission are inspired by the catholic prelature of opus dei.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $3,507,214 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,194,592 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $687,378 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $250k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $896k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION | $1,100,000 |
| MURRAY HILL PLACE INC | $1,004,058 |
| ARNOLD HALL INC | $257,615 |
| YUMA CENTER INC | $127,776 |
| ALDERTON HOUSE INC | $116,330 |
| CLEVEMONT INC | $110,970 |
| CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT | $108,000 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE | $105,000 |
| LONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC | $90,000 |
| SOUTHGATE FOUNDATION | $86,392 |
| STONECREST HOME ARTS INC | $78,195 |
| EXCEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $73,100 |
| VAN NESS CENTER INC | $46,564 |
| SOUTHMORE FOUNDATION INC | $44,000 |
| GRANDVUE INC | $42,910 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $726k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $490k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CAPITAL/PROGRAM GRANTS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMURRAY HILL PLACE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +42% · 35% of their budget
- YSYuma Study Center7× · 2018–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +3% · 70% of their budget
- TFTRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue ×93 · 97% of their budget
Funded once
- OSOAKCREST SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +27%
- RRRoseaire Retreat Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +57%
- SISHELLBOURNE INCone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We believe women play an integral role in shaping the family, workplaces, and the course of civilization. By accompanying women at every life stage, Arborlea Study Center aims to inspire women to develop personally, professionally and…
Courses in character development, spiritual retreats, courses in roman catholic doctrine, sports and hobby activities for youth, care of facilities for roman catholic worship, educational programs and staff residence. the spiritual…
Cultural and religious (roman catholic) classes, religious retreats, youth programs, individual spiritual direction, care of the chapel used for roman catholic liturgical services and private prayer.
Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.
The mission of the Menlough Study Center Inc is to provide moral intellectual and cultural formation consistant with Judea Christian principles and in cooperation with Opus Dei a personal prelature of the Catholic Church.
Post High School Education
To promote the intellectual, moral and cultural development of persons of all races, nationalities and creeds.
In cooperation with the Roman Catholic Prelature of Opus Dei, Darien Study Center fosters the search for holiness in the middle of the world, by means of ordinary work and all the other circumstances of daily life. See www.opusdei.org.
Our mission is to help individuals draw closer to God, grow in faith, and lead lives of purpose. While grounded in the Catholic faith tradition, we welcome all who are seeking sacred space for personal, professional, and spiritual growth.
Elmbrook operates a residence for eight people including university students and staff, and it features a Christian living environment, library and chapel. Elmbrook also provides instruction and service opportunities to an additional sixty…
The center for wisdoms women provides a sacred and safe space for the support and empowerment of women
To provide retreats to individuals and groups to foster spiritual renewal and growth
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation for Social and Educational Development and the most unlike its peers is Association for Educational Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MURRAY HILL PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Yuma Study Center ↗
- Who funds TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Stonecrest Home Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds OAKCREST SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Association for Educational Development ↗
- Who funds ALDERTON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Arnold Hall Inc ↗
- Who funds LONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVEMONT INC ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds PALMTRAIL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHOLD CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds VANCOURT INC ↗
- Who funds GRANDEVUE STUDY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Southgate Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Southmore Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Excel Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEDAR WOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Roseaire Retreat Inc ↗
- Who funds Charwick Study Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Aster Study Center Inc ↗
- Who funds VAN NESS STUDY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PETAWA RESIDENCE AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INITIATIVES FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHELLBOURNE INC ↗
- Who funds LINDELL STUDY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Woodlawn Foundation · Corporation for Social and Educational Development · Co Tua John F Cuneo Jr Fnd · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosemoor Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rosemoor Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rosemoor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.