How much did ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC reported 22 grants totaling $4,194,592 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC based?

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC is based in NY.

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC

Rosemoor foundation, inc.

$4.2M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$1.1M

Largest

01What you fund

0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Religion$15MEducation$4.3MRecreation & Sports$4.0MInternational$3.0MHuman Services$726kYouth Development$60kOther$4.0M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

acisaxumaci'scountriesoperatestrimountowns

2019

strategiesacisaxumisraelaci'scountriesoperates

2020

personal professionalprofessional developement

2021

personal professionalprofessional developementtrimount

2022

empowerlivesmedicalfocused culturalcultural intellectualintellectual professionalprofessional faith

2023

livesothersempowermedicalfocused culturalcultural intellectualintellectual professional

2024

strategiesmedicalacisaxumartpersonal professionalprofessional developement

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k10 grants · $250k
$50k–250k9 grants · $896k
$250k+3 grants · $2.4M

$78,195

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION$1,100,000
MURRAY HILL PLACE INC$1,004,058
ARNOLD HALL INC$257,615
YUMA CENTER INC$127,776
ALDERTON HOUSE INC$116,330
CLEVEMONT INC$110,970
CORPORATION FOR SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT$108,000
ASSOCIATION FOR CULTURAL INTERCHANGE$105,000
LONGLEA CONFERENCE CENTER INC$90,000
SOUTHGATE FOUNDATION$86,392
STONECREST HOME ARTS INC$78,195
EXCEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$73,100
VAN NESS CENTER INC$46,564
SOUTHMORE FOUNDATION INC$44,000
GRANDVUE INC$42,910

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $726k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$29M · 27 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$29M

$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%

+32%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MH
MURRAY HILL PLACE INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +42% · 35% of their budget
YC
YUMA CENTER INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +3% · 70% of their budget
TF
TRIMOUNT FOUNDATION
7× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +11855% · 97% of their budget

Funded once

OS
OAKCREST SCHOOL
one grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +23%
RR
ROSAIRE RETREATS INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +32%
SI
SHELLBOURNE INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arborlea Study Center

We believe women play an integral role in shaping the family, workplaces, and the course of civilization. By accompanying women at every life stage, Arborlea Study Center aims to inspire women to develop personally, professionally and…

Arts & Culture

Theresians International Inc

Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It is a community of women who desire to grow spiritually within a Christian community.

—

Springbank Christian Center Dominican Retreat Hous

Retreat center for eco-spirituality and the arts.

Human Services

Menlough Study Center Inc

The Mission of Menlough Study Center Inc is to provide spiritual formation consistent with Judeo-Christian principles and in cooperation with Opus Dei a prelature of the Catholic Church.

Religion

Wespine Study Center Inc

Courses in character development, spiritual retreats, courses in roman catholic doctrine, sports and hobby activities for youth, care of facilities for roman catholic worship, educational programs and staff residence. the spiritual…

Religion

Layton Study Center Inc

Cultural and religious (roman catholic) classes, religious retreats, youth programs, individual spiritual direction, care of the chapel used for roman catholic liturgical services and private prayer.

Religion

Center for Wisdoms Women

The center for wisdom's women provides a sacred and safe space for the support and empowerment of women.

Human Services

Darien Study Center Inc

In cooperation with the Roman Catholic Prelature of Opus Dei, Darien Study Center fosters the search for holiness in the middle of the world, by means of ordinary work and all the other circumstances of daily life. See www.opusdei.org.

Education

Westfield Residence Inc

To provide facilities as residence and cultural center for high school, college, and professional women through the conduct of intellect and cultural seminars in helping the women exert a positive influence in whatever environment they…

Human Services

Walnut Grove Cultural Center Inc

To offer a variety of intellectual and cultural programs that help women develop and strengthen their character, friendships and work ethics and equip them to be a positive influence in their families and communities.

Arts & Culture

The Trinity Institute Inc

Religious education and retreat facilities.

—

Iron Rose Sister Ministries

To facilitate christian relationships, develop, write, and publish women's bible studies; to conduct seminars, ladies days, women's retreats across the americas; teaching and inspiring women, lead interactive small group bible studies,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation for Social and Educational and the most unlike its peers is Woodlawn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/31

the rest of the field

10,118/120,729

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/31

Grantees still filing

20/31

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Religion$14,740,538Education$4,284,092Other$4,049,644Recreation & Sports$3,969,109International$3,021,000Human Services$725,850Youth Development$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Woodlawn FoundationNY33.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Woodlawn Foundation · Corporation for Social and Educational · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VANCOURT INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 133745933 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VANCOURT INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 99% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Rosemoor Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rosemoor Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rosemoor Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rosemoor Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph