· Public charity
Corporation for Social and Educational Development
To promote intellectual, moral, cultural and religious development irrespective of race, color, creed, nationality and financial resources.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $336k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER | $195,500 |
| SHELLBOURNE INC | $84,000 |
| PETAWA CULTURAL CENTER | $56,700 |
| LINDELL STUDY CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EUELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $955k · revenue +87% · 52% of their budget
- SISHELLBOURNE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $374k · revenue +8%
- RFROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC3× · 2017–2021 · $104k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- WFWOODLAWN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -3%
- WIWYNNCLIFF INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +102%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center for wisdoms women provides a sacred and safe space for the support and empowerment of women
We believe women play an integral role in shaping the family, workplaces, and the course of civilization. By accompanying women at every life stage, Arborlea Study Center aims to inspire women to develop personally, professionally and…
Provides resources, support, and educational opportunities for individuals for whom "women" is a meaningful identifier.
The transforming center creates space for god to strengthen the souls of leaders and transform communities by providing retreats, relationships, and resources for those who long to keep seeking god in the crucible of leadership.
The sophia institute provides leading edge programs taught by the world's foremost thinkers and teachers that foster wisdom, wholeness, oneness, sustainability, peace, and the integration of the sacred feminine and masculine for the…
WomanPreach! Inc is committed to training preachers who often emerge from churches, academic institutions, and other spaces that are inhospitable to their vocation and their voice. We provide intimate, practical training and nurturing…
To provide a woman friendly setting for seminary style classes to help women grow in maturity through Christian theology
Courses in character development, spiritual retreats, courses in roman catholic doctrine, sports and hobby activities for youth, care of facilities for roman catholic worship, educational programs and staff residence. the spiritual…
Women of the world endowment's mission is to promote gender-diverse decision making by informing the ecosystem about the positive impact of investing with a gender focus. wowe's work focuses on creating sustainable investment systems by…
Treatment center for women with drug and alcohol addictions
Cultural and religious (roman catholic) classes, religious retreats, youth programs, individual spiritual direction, care of the chapel used for roman catholic liturgical services and private prayer.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sherlake Cultural Center and the most unlike its peers is Rosemoor Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PETAWA RESIDENCE AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ELMS UNIVERSITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHELLBOURNE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHOLD CENTER FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROSEMOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHERLAKE CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LINDELL STUDY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE GROVE CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WYNNCLIFF INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rosemoor Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Corporation for Social and Educational Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.