· Public charity
Rooted
To dramatically increase the number of dps students attending schools that partner authentically with communities to deliver a high quality education for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $296k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $535k
- $250k+1 grant · $529k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUMINARY LEARNING | $529,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREP | $207,000 |
| DENVER FAMILIES FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $158,338 |
| RADIAN | $120,000 |
| ROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| SCHOOL BOARD PARTNERS | $45,500 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $40,000 |
| FAITHBRIDGE | $40,000 |
| STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC | $21,500 |
| JUNTOS COMMUNITY | $20,000 |
| EDNIUM THE ALUMNI COLLECTIVE | $20,000 |
| MONTBELLO ORGANIZING COMMITTEE | $20,000 |
| 50CAN INC | $20,000 |
| COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $20,000 |
| MONARCH MONTESSORI | $18,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLLUMINARY LEARNING NETWORK6× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +171% · 43% of their budget
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS4× · 2019–2022 · $1.6M · revenue +70%
- SPStrive Preparatory Schools5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +125%
Funded once
EMPOWER SCHOOLS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $385k · revenue +79%- RERoots Elementary Schoolone grant, 2019 · $125k · revenue -59%
- BCBLACK CAPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -92% · 62% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…
Empower colorado education leaders through advocacy, professional learning and networking to deliver on the promise of public education
Dsst public schools transforms urban public education by eliminating educational inequity and preparing all students for success in college and the 21st century.
To dramatically increase the number of dps students attending schools that partner authentically with communities to deliver a high quality education for all.
Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.
Soar charter school was founded in 2010 and is built on the premise that we should "expect more" from our public schools. soar students create full and meaningful lives, enrich our democracy, and contribute to a more just society.
ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…
GOAL Academy is an alternative education online blended high school serving students across the state of Colorado. GOAL's mission statement is "to develop productive members of society". GOAL's vision statement is "to help all students…
Great education colorado harnesses the power of grassroots activism and diverse, inclusive networks to guarantee that public schools in every colorado community are welcoming and adequately, equitably, and sustainably funded
Through authentic academic experiences and a culture of holistic wellness embedded in strong diverse community, 5280 high school prepares all students for success in college, their future career, and anything life throws at them.
Education of students with learning differences
Every student regardless of background or skill level will achieve mastery and will demonstrate that they can succeed in high school in college and in their chosen career. no exceptons no excuses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Black Capital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DSST PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LYRA ↗
- Who funds LUMINARY LEARNING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PREPARATORY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST DENVER INNOVATION ZONE ↗
- Who funds Strive Preparatory Schools ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds 50CAN INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO LEAGUE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Moonshot edVentures ↗
- Who funds BEACON NETWORK SCHOOLS INNOVATION ZONE ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds RADIAN PLACEMATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds American Indian Academy of Denver ↗
- Who funds KIPP Colorado Schools ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds FaithBridge ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION REFORM NOW INC ↗
- Who funds RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds OUR TURN INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL BOARD PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Young African Americans for Social and Political Activism ↗
- Who funds CHARTER BOARD PARTNERS D/B/A EDUCATION BOARD PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Colorado Latino Leadership Advocacy & Research Organization ↗
- Who funds GENERATION TEACH INC ↗
- Who funds Montbello Organizing Committee ↗
- Who funds DENVER FAMILIES FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CLIMB HIGHER COLORADO ↗
- Who funds THE HADANOU COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds Roots Elementary School ↗
- Who funds EDNIUM THE ALUMNI COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BLACK CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Daniels Fund · Margulf Foundation · Gary Philanthropy · Wend II Inc · Donnell-Kay Foundation Inc · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund · Lyra
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rooted funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Generation Teach Inc — 42% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.