· Private foundation
Ronald And Carol Moore Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $195k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $800k
- $250k+2 grants · $680k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Colorado Foundation | $400,000 |
| Archdiocese of Denver | $280,000 |
| EVAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION II INC | $125,000 |
| Colorado Uplift Inc | $100,000 |
| ACE Scholarships | $100,000 |
| Craig Hospital Foundation | $100,000 |
| Friends of Denver Fire Department | $75,000 |
| Ability Connection | $50,000 |
| Colorado State University Foundation | $50,000 |
| Dumb Friends League | $50,000 |
| Turning Point USA | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Colorado Golf Foundation | $50,000 |
| Cherry Hills Village Police Foundation | $25,000 |
| Denver Santa Clause Shop | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $700k · revenue +3%
- CHCraig Hospital Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $485k · revenue +111%
- AFALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION4× · 2021–2024 · $375k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- VRVAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -79%
- CGColorado Golf Hall of Fame Museumone grant, 2023 · $75k
- DPDENVER POLICE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +87%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Establish a secure way for the public to contribute to victims of mass tragedy and to assist local communities with the financial, emotional, and physical needs of victims of mass tragedies in Colorado
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity
Philanthropy colorado is a nonprofit membership association for grantmakers throughout the state. its mission is strengthen colorado communities by bringing people, information and resources together.
The CDA Foundation advances access to oral healthcare through charitable giving, supports the future of the profession through dental school scholarships and promotes dental professional wellbeing.
Our mission is to empower colorado students to achieve a lifetime of economic understanding and financial freedom. how will we achieve this mission? by providing economic and personal financial education to students through training…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Drifters Hearts of Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds WELL-BEING CENTER OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds ABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
- Who funds ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ENDOW ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DENVER FIRE DEPT ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INITIATIVE FOR WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAXFUND INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
- Who funds CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER POLICE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Pema Foundation Inc · Daniels Fund · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Anschutz Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ronald And Carol Moore Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ronald And Carol Moore Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ronald And Carol Moore Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.