Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rohovsky Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$148kReligion$58kHousing & Shelter$38kHuman Services$35kYouth Development$26kHealth$19kAnimals$16kEnvironment$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$503k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$5,000
CAFE OF LIFE$4,000
KIAWAH CONSERVANCY$3,500
LANDON SCHOOL$3,445
SQUASHBUSTERS$3,000
CANINE COMPANIONS$3,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGS$3,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$2,000
ROLLING HILLS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,000
BONITA BAY VETERANS COUNCIL$2,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PA$1,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LEE COUNTY$1,078
THE POTOMAC SCHOOL$1,048
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS: $6k → 15%CANINE COMPANIONS: $4k → 15%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 15%CANINE COMPANIONS: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$387k · 22 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$387k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +34%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $34k · revenue +112%
  • CO
    CAFE OF LIFE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANTHONY TRUST OF HARTFORD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -64%
  • F
    FAKAHATCHEE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
12
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bonita Bay Veterans Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $46,000 · OtherTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INCRAGERSVILLE UNITED CHURCH: $22,575 · OtherRAGERSVILLE UNITED CHURCHFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGS: $18,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BONITA SPRINGSVIRGINIA SPECIALIST CANCER FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherVIRGINIA SPECIALIST CANCER FOUNDATIONGEORGE SCHOOL: $14,500 · OtherGEORGE SCHOOLFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCSHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LEE COUNTY: $8,234 · Other+5 more: $21,500 · Other+5 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $34,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWE…LANDON SCHOOL: $26,445 · EducationLANDON SCHOOLThe Potomac School: $21,096 · EducationThe Potomac SchoolCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $14,500 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSI…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…+1 more: $3,500 · EducationCAFE OF LIFE INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $15,999 · Human ServicesLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $6,300 · Human ServicesBONITA BAY VETERANS COUNCIL: $13,000 · Arts & CultureThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc: $9,000 · EnvironmentLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyThe Independence Fund Inc: $2,421 · Public Benefit
Other$219,809Education$108,041Housing & Shelter$30,000Human Services$22,299Arts & Culture$13,000Environment$9,000Philanthropy$6,000Public Benefit$2,421

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $46,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $26,445 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac School: $21,096 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $15,999 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBONITA BAY VETERANS COUNCIL: $13,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $6,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST ANTHONY TRUST OF HARTFORD INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $2,421 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAFE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Potomac School ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BONITA BAY VETERANS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANTHONY TRUST OF HARTFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Foundation IncFL15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rohovsky Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rohovsky Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rohovsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph