· Private foundation
Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $267k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER | $37,200 |
| HOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| JUMP THE MOON FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EDGEMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $21,000 |
| RIVER SIDON PEACE WITH | $20,000 |
| MADISON HIGH SCHOOL | $13,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,000 |
| QUEEN CREEK HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SOLEY FOR KIDS SHOE DRIVE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| NAUVOO ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| MAPLE GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| ELKO INSTITUTE OF ACADEMIC | $10,000 |
| PLAY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
- ABARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +5%
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION INC2× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- IFIDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DIST 91one grant, 2022 · $48k
- NENEBO EDUCATION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue -27%
- SMST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide traing that assists school psych
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Ronald McDonald House Mountain West surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.
To prevent teen suicide in Arizona by enhancing resiliency in youth and fostering supportive communities. Vision is that all youth possess a sense of connectedness and hope for their future. Teen Lifeline has a singular focus to prevent…
We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care
To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.
Camp hobe provides psychosocial support for children with cancer (and similar disorders) and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is East Idaho Aquarium Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEBO EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Hope Street Group ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds JUMP THE MOON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Flourish Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds SPRINGS OF REDEMPTION ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds MADISON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F?
Find your warmest path to Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.