Skip to content
Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc

Planned parenthood of the rocky mountains, which includes health centers in colorado, southern nevada, and new mexico, has been helping individuals make responsible choices for over 104 years.pprm empowers individuals and families in the communities we serve to make informed choices about their sexual and reproductive health by providing…

$897k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$690k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.8MCivil Rights$82kCrime & Legal$20kFood & Nutrition$17kCommunity Improvement$17kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $184k
  • $250k+1 grant · $690k
$99,888
Median grant
2
States reached
$79M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND$690,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO CONTRACT AND GRANT ACCOUNTING HBC MSC09 5225$99,888
BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO$84,600
COLORADOANS PROTECTING PATIENT ACCESS$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO: $215k → 23%BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO: $85k → 23%BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO: $85k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 6 repeat orgs$369k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$6.5M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+9%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue -16% · 69% of their budget
  • BF
    BOLD FUTURES NM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $384k · revenue -14%
  • NB
    NM BLACK CENTRAL ORGANIZING
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO - HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $92k
  • CC
    COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +8%
  • CO
    COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Mexico Voices for Children

To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…

Civil Rights
2
Comunidad De Colores

Our mission is to promote health equity in Northern New Mexico by improving quality and access to health services regardless of one's insurance status or ability to pay.

Health
3
New Mexico Safety Over Profit

We are a values-driven advocacy organization committed to defending and expanding consumer protections, corporate and insurance accountability, and access to justice in New Mexico. Our work is led by consumers, survivors of sexual assault,…

Health
4
Colorado People's Action

Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…

—
5
New Mexico Legal Aid Inc

Provide legal assistance in proceedings or matters to persons financially unable to afford legal assistance in the state of new mexico, excluding san juan county.

Crime & Legal
6
New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence

The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.

—
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
9
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
10
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

—
11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico

Aclu-nm is the state affiliate of the aclu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. the purpose of aclu-nm is to protect and advance justice, liberty and equity as guaranteed by the constitutions of new mexico…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs; the most unlike its peers is Protect Patient Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC: $6,005,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC+6 more: $323,934 · OtherBOLD FUTURES NM: $384,296 · Human ServicesEquality New Mexico Foundation: $16,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $55,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $18,600 · Civil RightsPROTECT PATIENT ACCESS INC: $14,000 · Civil RightsPROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA: $7,500 · Civil RightsTHE OBODO COLLECTIVE INC: $17,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,328,934Human Services$410,296Health$55,000Civil Rights$40,100Community Improvement$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC: $6,005,000 over 9y, 69% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM: $384,296 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN: $55,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $55,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAMS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $18,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OBODO COLLECTIVE INC: $17,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetEquality New Mexico Foundation: $16,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetPROTECT PATIENT ACCESS INC: $14,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Mexico Fund for W…Borealis PhilanthropyNEO Philanthropy IncNew Venture FundCenter for Civic Poli…Groundswell FundSanta Fe Community Fo…Amalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Philanthr…Tides FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…
New Mexico Fund for Women and GirlsNM17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Borealis Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Center for Civic Policy · Groundswell Fund · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home