· Public charity
Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc
Planned parenthood of the rocky mountains, which includes health centers in colorado, southern nevada, and new mexico, has been helping individuals make responsible choices for over 104 years.pprm empowers individuals and families in the communities we serve to make informed choices about their sexual and reproductive health by providing…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $858,646 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $900,672 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,026 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $177k
- $250k+1 grant · $675k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND | $675,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO CONTRACT AND GRANT ACCOUNTING HBC MSC09 5225 | $92,046 |
| BOLD FUTURES NEW MEXICO | $84,600 |
| COLORADOANS PROTECTING PATIENT ACCESS | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +8% · 69% of their budget- BFBOLD FUTURES NM2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue -14%
- NBNM BLACK CENTRAL ORGANIZING2× · 2021–2022 · $40k
Funded once
- CCCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGNone grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +8%
- COCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTSone grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -28%
- FSFIFTH SUN PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado people's action (cpa) is a member-driven, racial justice organization dedicated to winning long-lasting progressive public policies in colorado. cpa builds power by mobilizing voters, electing our own people to office, holding…
To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
We are a values-driven advocacy organization committed to defending and expanding consumer protections, corporate and insurance accountability, and access to justice in New Mexico. Our work is led by consumers, survivors of sexual assault,…
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact
Provide legal assistance in proceedings or matters to persons financially unable to afford legal assistance in the state of new mexico, excluding san juan county.
The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…
The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
Empowering Latino communities through leadership development, advocacy, and policy research to strengthen Colorado
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs and the most unlike its peers is The Obodo Collective Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOLD FUTURES NM ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COALITION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE OBODO COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Equality New Mexico Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds PROTECT PATIENT ACCESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Borealis Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Center for Civic Policy · Groundswell Fund · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.