Skip to content
Roc USA LLC at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Roc USA LLC

Roc usa supports homeowners in manufactured home communities to achieve affordable and environmentally sustainable self-governing cooperatives.

$860k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$2.6MHousing & Shelter$407kCrime & Legal$40kEmployment$15kRecreation & Sports$15kEducation$2k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $837,952, the rows itemized in this filing. The $859,586 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,634 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $73k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$224M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROYAL OAKS COOPERATIVE INC$750,000
THISTLE$12,006
COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$11,267
NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA$10,000
LEAP HOUSING INC$10,000
NORTCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER$10,000
CASA OF OREGON$10,000
NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND$9,485
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT$5,194
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND: $5k → 14%NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER: $25k → 16%LEAP CHARITIES: $52k → 8%NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $160k → 11%ALL PARKS ALLIANCE FOR CHANGE: $50k → 14%NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA: $180k → 14%ROYAL OAKS COOPERATIVE INC: $750k → 11%CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $170k → 16%COMMUNITY HOUSING EXPANSION OF AUSTIN: $100k → 10%CASA OF OREGON: $10k → 8%CAROLINA COMMON ENTERPRISE: $50k → 11%COOPERATIVA NUEVA UNION: $1.0M → 11%THISTLE: $25k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOMEOWNERS COOP: $5k → 17%NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10k → 9%ANDREA LEVERE: $38k → 8%NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND: $13k → 7%NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER: $15k → 16%LEAP HOUSING INC: $43k → 8%NORTCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA: $10k → 14%CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $100k → 16%THISTLE: $12k → 12%NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $8k → 9%ANDREA LEVERE: $26k → 8%NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND: $9k → 7%LEAP HOUSING INC: $20k → 8%NORTCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA: $10k → 14%CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 16%THISTLE: $10k → 12%LEAP HOUSING INC: $10k → 8%NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$863k · 10 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +237% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$863k
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+237%
+6%

Still filing today

90%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATION DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2020–2024 · $275k · revenue +15%
  • NC
    NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +340% · 34% of their budget
  • LC
    LEAP CHARITIES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +237%

Funded once

  • CN
    COOPERATIVA NUEVA UNION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • NM
    NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA
    one grant, 2020 · $180k
  • CH
    Community Housing Expansion of Austin
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter
2
Renting Partnerships

To provide an economic model that allows people who must rent to build financial security while staying rooted in their homes and communities.

Unclassified
3
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
4
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
6
California Coalition for Rural Housing Project

The California Coalition for Rural Housing (CCRH) advocates for a thriving rural California by expanding affordable housing opportunitiies for rural, Tribal and farmworker communities. Founded in 1976, CCRH is one of the nation's oldest…

Housing & Shelter
7
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter
8
Cooperation Vermont Community Land Trust

The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.

Community Improvement
9
Community Development Corporation of Utah

The community development corporation of utah (cdcu) helps our community thrive by empowering people on their path toward financial security, housing stability, and access to affordable homes.we achieve this by:1. increasing financial…

Housing & Shelter
10
Door County Housing Partnership Inc

The Door County Housing Partnership is creating a stable supply of permanently affordable housing for year-round residents to maintain the character, vibrancy, and diversity of the Door County community. Door County has an affordable…

Housing & Shelter
11
Cape Fear Community Land Trust Inc

Cape Fear Community Land Trust (CFCLT) exists to sustain vibrant, diverse communities by creating housing opportunities for working families. Our vision is a region filled with vibrant, holistic, and economically diverse communities with…

Housing & Shelter
12
Ecothrive Housing

EcoThrive Housing provides pathways to home ownership by co-creating beautiful, affordable, sustainable villages with local communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montana Homeownership Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is All Parks Alliance for Change. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COOPERATIVA NUEVA UNION: $1,000,000 · OtherCOOPERATIVA NUEVA UNIONROYAL OAKS COOPERATIVE INC: $750,000 · OtherROYAL OAKS COOPERATIVE INCNEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA: $180,000 · OtherNEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA+9 more: $201,610 · Other+9 moreNORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $185,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHCOUNTRY COO…Community Housing Expansion of Austin: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Housin…Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSalt Lake Neighb…Thistle Community Housing: $47,006 · Housing & ShelterThistle Communit…PATHSTONE CORPORATION: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterPATHSTONE CORPOR…MONTANA HOMEOWNERSHIP NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterMONTANA HOMEOWNE…CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATION DEVELOPMENT: $275,194 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA CE…COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $51,267 · Community ImprovementCOOPERATIVE D…Carolina Common Enterprise: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCarolina Comm…LEAP CHARITIES INC: $125,000 · InternationalNATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER INC: $40,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,131,610Housing & Shelter$452,006Community Improvement$376,461International$125,000Crime & Legal$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATION DEVELOPMENT: $275,194 over 3y, 18% of budgetNORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetLEAP CHARITIES INC: $125,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCommunity Housing Expansion of Austin: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $51,267 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCarolina Common Enterprise: $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThistle Community Housing: $47,006 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $26,985 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA HOMEOWNERSHIP NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $23,350 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Cooperative Developme…Neighborhood Reinvest…Wells Fargo FoundationFidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Cooperative Development Foundation · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roc USA LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roc USA LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Cooperative Development Institute Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Community and Shelter Assistance Corp: 5% of income from government
  • National Consumer Law Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roc USA LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home