How much did ROC USA LLC grant in FY2024?

ROC USA LLC reported 10 grants totaling $859,586 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

ROC USA LLC

The organization's purpose is to aid people living in manufactured home communities (mhcs) so that as a group they can purchase their communities and operate them as resident-owned and/or controlled entities thereby: (I) preserving long-term existence and affordability of the manufactured housing sector;(ii) creating a stable environment…

$860k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$750k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of ROC USA LLC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

investmentcooperativetechnicaleducation

2021

—

2022

particularlylow-incomenclcconsumer lawdisadvantagedexpertisepolicy

2023

buildingfinancialinstitutionsfinanceloannclcconsumer law

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $15k
$10k–50k7 grants · $73k
$250k+1 grant · $750k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$224M

Total assets

Largest grants

ROYAL OAKS COOPERATIVE INC$750,000
THISTLE$12,006
COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$11,267
CASA OF OREGON$10,000
NORTCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER$10,000
NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA$10,000
LEAP HOUSING INC$10,000
NH COMMUNITY LOAN FUND$9,485
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT$5,194

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 92% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$863k · 10 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +146% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$863k

$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%

+6%

Still filing today

90%

45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementInternationalCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT
3× · 2020–2024 · $275k · revenue +120%
NC
NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +340% · 34% of their budget
LH
LEAP HOUSING INC
4× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +3071%

Funded once

CN
COOPERATIVA NUEVA UNION
one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
NM
NEIGHBORWORKS MONTANA
one grant, 2020 · $180k
CH
COMMUNITY HOUSING EXPANSION OF AUSTIN
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ecothrive Housing

EcoThrive Housing provides pathways to home ownership by co-creating beautiful, affordable, sustainable villages with local communities.

Housing & Shelter

Boulder Housing Coalition

Provide affordable cooperative housing to the people of Boulder County, Colorado.

Housing & Shelter

Cooperative Housing Corporation

To provide affordable shared living residences and services to older and special needs adults.

Housing & Shelter

Neighborhood Development Collaborative

Our mission is to provide affordable housing, community-oriented commercial development, and comprehensive housing resources for disinvested communities across Metro Denver; educate metro-area stakeholders and municipalities about the…

Housing & Shelter

Community Housing Capital Inc

Community housing capital primarily provides (see schedule o for continuation) multifamily and single family development, and interim acquistion & development lending for affordable housing preservation and development for the benefit of…

Housing & Shelter

Cooperative Development Services Inc

To help start and grow cooperatively owned enterprises.

—

Neighborhood Housing Services of

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter

Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is an alliance in the Portland Metropolitan Region that uses its collective resources to build a movement for housing justice. We believe that everyone deserves to have an affordable and safe home in a neighborhood of their…

Community Improvement

Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and

CNHED has achieved successes that combines effective advocacy, policy making, public education, capacity building, information and analysis, and engages members and allies in a practical manner to help ensure that low-income residents have…

Housing & Shelter

Northern California Land Trust

NCLT is dedicated to creating and preserving affordable housing for people with low to moderate incomes.

—

California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

Community Housing Partnership

Providing affordable housing to underserved communities locally and around the world.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carolina Common Enterprise and the most unlike its peers is Cooperative Development Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

13/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,130,610Housing & Shelter$452,006Community Improvement$376,461International$125,000Crime & Legal$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community Partners IncMD15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROC USA LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~68 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 411953515 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 68 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 34% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Roc USA LLC?

Find your warmest path to Roc USA LLC through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROC USA LLC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roc USA LLC?

More from the funding graph

ROC USA LLC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roc USA LLC?

More from the funding graph