· Public charity
Cooperative Development Foundation
To promote and develop cooperatives to improve economic opportunities for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 21 grants below total $800,463 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $870,870 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,407 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $267k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $485k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Kansas State University Foundation | $240,318 |
| North Dakota State University | $144,196 |
| French Broad Trading Cooperative Inc | $100,000 |
| South Carolina Cooperatives Care Foundation | $49,900 |
| Human Connections Fund | $49,900 |
| NCBA CLUSA | $35,000 |
| Columinate Community Foundation | $26,500 |
| Naugatuck Valley Project Inc | $25,000 |
| Langston University Foundation | $23,712 |
| Hendersonville Community Co-op | $15,800 |
| Cooperative Development Institute Inc | $11,450 |
| Austin Cooperative Business Foundation | $10,000 |
| Ralph K Morris Foundation | $10,000 |
| Federation of Southern Cooperatives LAF | $10,000 |
| The Working World dba Seed Commons | $9,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Cooperative Development Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 9% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KSKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2021 · $249k · revenue +42%
- SDSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · $164k · revenue +26%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $126k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SDSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $350k
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUNDone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -21%- DCDAKOTA COLLEGE AT BOTTINEAU FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $158k · revenue +512% · 32% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cincinnati union cooperative initiative partners with individuals and other organizations to develop worker-owned businesses which provide family- sustaining jobs and create economy that works for all.
Community Cooperative's mission is to support entrepreneurs and organizations advancing the cooperative and solidarity economy through connection to funding, training, workshops, networks, and resources that foster leadership in the…
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
To advance the business and policy interests of america's cooperatives and other farmer-owned enterprises.
To help start and grow cooperatively owned enterprises
To enhance cooperation, friendship, understanding, and sharing of resources among universities in the international academic community.
The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…
The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.
Promote, represent & advocate for the cooperative way of doing business
The national credit union foundation envisions a world where everyone can achieve financial well-being. we exist to improve financial well-being with and through credit unions. we do this through two strategic priorities. first, we inspire…
Creating a cooperative culture
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Co-Op Initiative and the most unlike its peers is Chs Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COOPERATIVE LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds LANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA COLLEGE AT BOTTINEAU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ICA GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVES CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMAN CONNECTIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES ↗
- Who funds RALPH K MORRIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD CO-OP INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds NORTHCOUNTRY COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC ↗
- Who funds THE WORKING WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds NAUGATUCK VALLEY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP ↗
- Who funds CHS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLECTIVE REMAKE ART BUSINESS EDUCATION JOBS NEWS PEOPLE AND REC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Cooperative Charitable Trust · Roc USA LLC · The Kendeda Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cooperative Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cooperative Development Institute Inc — 58% of income from government
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cooperative Development Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cooperative Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.