Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert S Starr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$61kInternational$60kHealth$39kFood & Nutrition$33kReligion$32kEducation$28kAnimals$24kRecreation & Sports$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINDERING - SIBLING SUPPORT PROJECT$4,000
TRINITY FIRST LUTHERAN SCHOOL$4,000
BOOKS FOR AFRICA$3,000
CAMP ODAYIN$3,000
CHAIR-ITY INC$3,000
START SENIOR SOLUTIONS$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$3,000
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$3,000
CAN DO CANINES$2,500
MINNESOTA TEEN CHALLENGE$2,000
CROSS VIEW LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES$2,000
CARINGBRIDGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAIR-ITY INC: $3k → 17%CHAIR-ITY INC: $2k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $2k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $2k → 17%THRESHOLD TO NEW LIFE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$290k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+5%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +94%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +98%
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +246%

Funded once

  • TT
    THRESHOLD TO NEW LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • LM
    LITERACY MATTERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -28%
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN MINNESOTA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
3
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
4
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
5
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless

Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…

—
8
Avivo

Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services
9
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
11
Reach for Resources Inc

Empowering people of all abilities to reach their full potential. we provide individualized services that maximize independence, boosts community engagement and improves physical and emotional well-being.

—
12
Midwest Challenge Inc

Sharing the gospel while providing hope and transformation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is World Bicycle Relief Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherTRINITY FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $24,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION INCSALVATION ARMY: $19,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSTART SENIOR SOLUTIONS: $16,500 · OtherSTART SENIOR SOLUTIONSCAN DO CANINES: $15,500 · OtherCAN DO CANINESKINDERING - SIBLING SUPPORT PROJECT: $14,000 · OtherKINDERING - SIBLING SUPPORT PROJECTVEAP Inc: $10,000 · OtherVEAP IncFORCE: $6,000 · OtherCROSS VIEW LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5,500 · Other+5 more: $8,000 · Other+5 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA …FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $23,000 · InternationalFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INCBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $18,000 · InternationalBOOKS FOR AFRICA INCGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES: $12,500 · InternationalGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $29,000 · HealthMinnesota Tee…METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $4,000 · HealthMETAVIVOR RES…+2 more: $2,000 · Health+2 moreCAMP ODAYIN: $17,000 · Recreation & SportsCHAIR-ITY: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING PLACE: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHRESHOLD TO NEW LIFE: $2,000 · Human ServicesAnimal Humane Society: $8,000 · AnimalsNanze Childrens Services Inc: $4,000 · Education
Other$145,500International$78,500Health$35,000Recreation & Sports$17,000Human Services$11,000Animals$8,000Education$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $29,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN: $17,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSTART SENIOR SOLUTIONS: $16,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $15,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES: $12,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVEAP Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIR-ITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNanze Childrens Services Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHRESHOLD TO NEW LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY MATTERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MINNESOTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY CHOICES LIFECARE CENTER I: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSWAYS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ODAYIN ↗
  • Who funds START SENIOR SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds CHAIR-ITY ↗
  • Who funds Nanze Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds THRESHOLD TO NEW LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CHOICES LIFECARE CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds CROSSWAYS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert S Starr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert S Starr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert S Starr Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert S Starr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert S Starr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph