Skip to content
Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund at a glance

· Public charity

Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund

Support of various charitable organizations.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$196kHuman Services$138kInternational$30kArts & Culture$25kHealth$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kReligion$13kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $33,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$747k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEOPLE4PEACE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS: $10k → 14%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $52k → 23%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $52k → 23%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NEW ORLEANS: $18k → 23%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in LA; by stated purpose, 80%.

Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
4
The Jerusalem Connection
—
5
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
8
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
9
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
10
Jewish Life Foundation
—
11
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc

Since 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) has acted on behalf of North America's Jewish communities and others to fulfill the principle that "kol Yisrael arevim zeh l'zeh" - all Jews are responsible for one…

International
12
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Greater New Orleans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clover Nola Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $114,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $72,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANSTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCLOVER NOLA INC: $104,750 · Human ServicesCLOVER NOLA INCNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18,000 · Human ServicesNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTE…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS IN…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…SEEDS OF PEACE INC: $10,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF P…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH AGE…TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $25,000 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE4PEACE INC: $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $5,000 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $7,500 · ReligionISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$196,000Human Services$137,750International$40,000Health$25,000Arts & Culture$25,000Other$15,000Religion$7,500Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $114,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCLOVER NOLA INC: $104,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $72,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Goldring Family Found…Betty and Ira Kohn Fo…Luther and Zita Templ…The Usdin-Weil Founda…The Steeg Family Foun…Louis & Lillian Glaze…Woldenberg FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Goldring Family FoundationLA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goldring Family Foundation · Betty and Ira Kohn Foundation · Luther and Zita Templeman Foundation · The Usdin-Weil Foundation · The Steeg Family Foundation · Louis & Lillian Glazer Family Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert B and Shirley K Haspel Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home