· Private foundation
Anna May Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $117k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 549C | $10,000 |
| JACKSON COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE TEAM | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MT ASHLAND ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| ROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT | $5,000 |
| ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH | $5,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,500 |
| THE CREST | $4,500 |
| CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY | $4,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY | $4,500 |
| ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING | $4,000 |
| COLLEGE DREAMS INC DBA PROJECT YOUTH | $4,000 |
| COMPASS HOUSE INC | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $47k · revenue +36%
- CHCOMPASS HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +3%
- TFTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY3× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- URUNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -43%
- RBRiding Beyondone grant, 2023 · $5k
- KUKIDS UNLIMITED OREGONone grant, 2022 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…
Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…
To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.
The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.
Volunteers of america changes lives by promoting self-determination, building strong communities and standing for social justice.
Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Our mission is to inspire unlimited opportunities for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live the life they choose by providing person-centered supports tailored to the unique needs of each individual.
Provide outpatient mental and behavioral therapy for children and families, therapeutic treatment foster care to at-risk youth, as well as a variety of parent training services.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY ONE ↗
- Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ↗
- Who funds OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ALS Northwest ↗
- Who funds Reclaiming Lives ↗
- Who funds HEARTS WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND ↗
- Who funds ROOTS AND WINGS CHILD DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Oregon Conservatory of Perfoming Arts ↗
- Who funds UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds Riding Beyond ↗
- Who funds MT ASHLAND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds OREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · United Way of Jackson County Inc · The Collins Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Careoregon Inc · Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anna May Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kindred Matters — 100% of income from government
- The Arc Jackson County — 87% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Community Volunteer Network — 59% of income from government
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Hearts With a Mission — 51% of income from government
- Reclaiming Lives — 47% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time — 42% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Rogue Community Health — 13% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ontrack Inc — 7% of income from government
- Neurotherapeutic Pediatric Therapies Inc — 2% of income from government
- Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Symphony Association — 1% of income from government
- Scienceworks Hands-On Museum — 0% of income from government
- Casa of Jackson County Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anna May Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Anna May Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.