Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rita and Leo Greenland Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of RITA AND LEO GREENLAND FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$2,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC CITIZEN$25,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD$25,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$25,000
ADL$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$5,000
RAINFOREST TRUST$5,000
CORAL REEF ALLIANCE$5,000
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$5,000
GEORGETOWN LOMBARDI CANCER CENTER$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$5,000
TERGAR SCHOOLS$2,500
TERGAR INTERNATIONAL$2,500
SCRANTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
EASTERSEALS$1,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIDGE HOUSE: $2k → 9%BRIDGE HOUSE INC: $2k → 9%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS PATH: $1k → 14%BRIDGE HOUSE INC: $1k → 9%NY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $1k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $1k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $1k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $500 → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $500 → 17%KAPLAN PUBLIC SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%KAPLAN PUBLIC SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%KAPLAN PUBLIC SERVICE FDN: $250 → 17%KAPLAN PUBLIC SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%RECIPROCITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$688k · 62 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
60

Total granted

$688k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+17%

Still filing today

76%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $66k · revenue +14%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +111%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -4%
  • ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +78%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
8
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natem Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…Addiction Recovery ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/101
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,464

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/98
Grantees still filing
63/98
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADL — $100,000 · OtherADLTERGAR INTERNATIONAL — $33,500 · OtherTERGAR INTERNATIONALGEORGETOWN LOMBARDI CANCER CENTER — $27,500 · OtherGEORGETOWN LOMBARDI CANCER CENTERDEMOCRACY FORWARD — $25,000 · OtherDEMOCRACY FORWARDLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $18,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $15,000 · OtherCITY HARVEST INC — $14,100 · OtherYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC — $20,500 · Other+72 more — $166,096 · Other+72 moreSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $66,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLE…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $27,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSIT…LOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS — $25,000 · EducationLOS ANGELES REVIEW O…President and Fellows of Middlebury College — $10,525 · EducationPresident and Fellow…NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $5,750 · Education+7 more — $11,000 · Education+7 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $40,750 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEF…OCEAN CONSERVANCY — $40,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF AL…+6 more — $9,500 · Environment+6 moreRAINFOREST TRUST — $11,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $7,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $2,000 · International+8 more — $7,250 · InternationalAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $1,000 · Civil RightsSTEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC — $23,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL LINKS TRUST — $6,554 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $2,750 · Arts & CultureBRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $2,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $1,500 · Arts & CultureWRITERS GUILD FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $2,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC CITIZEN INC — $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$419,696Education$153,775Environment$130,250International$45,250Civil Rights$41,000Arts & Culture$40,304Public Benefit$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $66,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $40,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $40,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTERGAR INTERNATIONAL — $33,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS — $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC — $23,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC — $20,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $14,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OUTPOST FOUNDATION — $11,976 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $10,525 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $10,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LINKS TRUST — $6,554 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREES WATER AND PEOPLE — $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A MINDFUL SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTERGAR SCHOOLS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATEM FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TERGAR INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OUTPOST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LINKS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Co…Boston Foundation IncCalifornia Community …Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Tides FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Verizon FoundationRaymond James Charita…
Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rita and Leo Greenland Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Bridge House Inc — 88% of income from government
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines