· Public charity
Richmond American Foundation
As we look to the future, we are committed to lending a helping hand to those in need, embracing a diverse culture and working toward sustainability.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k43 grants · $629k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $874k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGIS UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION | $470,000 |
| THE DENVER POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH | $220,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO | $200,000 |
| THE WINNING TEAM FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION | $53,500 |
| HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| DENVER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS | $36,000 |
| UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION | $26,000 |
| CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $408k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $905k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +3%
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH5× · 2020–2024 · $890k · revenue +13%
DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS5× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- TWTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +27%
- DADENVER ART MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +52%
- DPDenver Post Community Foundationone grant, 2021 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hmong Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DENVER POST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Greenway Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOVERNORS RESIDENCE PRESERVATION FUND ↗
- Who funds DENVER POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Amp the Cause ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds CANCER LEAGUE OF COLORADO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER RUSTLERS INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS ↗
- Who funds CIVIC CENTER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds United States Olympic and Paralympic Museum ↗
- Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Western Union Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Pema Foundation Inc · Daniels Fund · Libertygives Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richmond American Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Richmond American Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Richmond American Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.