Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard V Lynch Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$64kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$39kHealth$28kArts & Culture$25kRecreation & Sports$25kYouth Development$16kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Francis Xavier HSO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
St Vincent de Paul Seminary$1,000
GOLF Scholarship Fund$1,000
Habitat for Humanity Collier County$500
St Norbert Church$500
Defenders of Wildlife$500
Incarnate Word Academy$500
National Wildlife Federation$500
Misercordia$300
MD Anderson Cancer Center$250
Sister Paulanne's Needy Family Fund$250
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$250
Muscular Dystrophy Association$210
St Patrick Catholic Church$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Parkinson's Association of SWFL: $500 → 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 33 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
20

Total granted

$215k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+24%

Still filing today

48%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +145%
  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +45%
  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    3× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOYOLA ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • KC
    Kohl's Childrens' Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • NM
    National MS Society
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Flint Creek Wildlife Rehabilitation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER: $40,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMERSt Norbert Church: $33,250 · OtherSt Norbert ChurchLOYOLA ACADEMY: $20,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYMisercordia: $18,250 · OtherMisercordiaHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $16,240 · OtherHOPE IGNITES CHICAGOSt Francis Xavier HSO: $14,345 · OtherSt Francis Xavier HSOIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+31 more: $38,851 · Other+31 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $18,200 · EducationUniversity of N…Big Shoulders Fund: $12,500 · EducationBig Shoulders F…INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationINCARNATE WORD …+3 more: $2,000 · Education+3 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,250 · HealthST JUDE C…PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,350 · HealthPARALYZED…+4 more: $910 · HealthNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,250 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $3,250 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,750 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $650 · Animals+1 more: $300 · AnimalsRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $856 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $600 · EnvironmentFLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION: $100 · Environment
Other$188,936Education$35,700Health$23,510Animals$10,200Arts & Culture$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Environment$1,556

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $18,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $16,240 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $856 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT CREEK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds CAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL16.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard V Lynch Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard V Lynch Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard V Lynch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph