Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rhoda & Henry Frank Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$500kPhilanthropy$86kRecreation & Sports$41kHousing & Shelter$6kAnimals$3kHuman Services$1kYouth Development$200Health$200Community Improvement$150Other$178k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WAUKESHA$9,887
SPRINGSONG MUSEUM$7,000
BETH SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$6,500
JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION$5,000
CHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM$5,000
PIECE OF MIND$3,000
MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC$2,500
ANGELICA VILLAGE$2,000
JAM FOR JAMAICA INC$2,000
DREAMSCAPE INC RESCUE$1,000
PAWS PRAYERS AND PROMISES$1,000
AMERICAN SADDLEBRED LEGACY FOUNDATION$1,000
CHICAGO LOOP SYNAGOGUE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
CO
KY
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$696k · 14 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
20

Total granted

$696k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    8× · 2017–2025 · $291k · revenue +58%
  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicago
    4× · 2017–2022 · $207k · revenue +33%
  • JG
    JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $56k · revenue +13%
  • TN
    THE NORTH CAROLINA THEATRE
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -24%
  • HE
    HOLOCAUST EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
2
Chamber Opera of Chicago
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
The Chicago Philharmonic Society

To excite, engage, and transform diverse audiences with the beauty and power of music.

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
7
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
9
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy
10
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
11
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
12
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grant Park Orchestral Association and the most unlike its peers is The American Saddlebred Legacy Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%13%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr22%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr15%6%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr22%88%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,333

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Chicago Symphony Orchestra — $291,141 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraLyric Opera of Chicago — $206,873 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of Chicago+4 more — $1,650 · Arts & CultureBETH SHALOM SYNAGOGUE — $30,600 · OtherBETH SHALOM SYNAGOGUELEAGUE OF THE CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $30,500 · OtherLEAGUE OF THE CHICAGO SY…CHICAGO LOOP SYNAGOGUE — $27,400 · OtherCHICAGO LOOP SYNAGOGUECONGREGATION EMANU EL — $24,137 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU ELCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM — $15,000 · OtherCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUMSPRINGSONG MUSEUM — $12,000 · OtherSPRINGSONG MUSEUMPeace of Mind Inc — $6,000 · Other+18 more — $32,800 · Other+18 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $56,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNIT…MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $29,500 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE J…JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION — $40,500 · Recreation & SportsANGELICA VILLAGE — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,500 · AnimalsThe American Saddlebred Legacy Foundatio — $1,000 · AnimalsTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE — $1,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$499,664Other$178,437Philanthropy$85,500Recreation & Sports$40,500Housing & Shelter$6,000Animals$2,500Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $291,141 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $206,873 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $56,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION — $40,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $29,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM — $15,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPeace of Mind Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetANGELICA VILLAGE — $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA THEATRE — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF MILWAUKEE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETERVILLE ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVE RESIDENTS — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rhoda & Henry Frank Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rhoda & Henry Frank Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rhoda & Henry Frank Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph