Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Restored

RESTORED is a non-profit thrift store operated with all volunteers so that our profits can be used for ministry that helps support community needs.

$343k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Health$337kReligion$317kHousing & Shelter$85kHuman Services$18kCommunity Improvement$10kFood & Nutrition$6kEducation$6k
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $284,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $342,981 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $58,731 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $206k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEREBINTH REFUGE$50,500
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$45,000
DON SHIRE MINISTRIES$40,000
WOOD LAKE CAMP & RETREAT CENTER$35,500
AMNION PREGNANCY CENTER$30,000
MINNESOTA TEEN CHALLENGE INC$25,000
WHISPERS OF HOPE$20,000
CASSIA$10,000
POLAND EVANGELICAL MISSION (PEM)$8,000
TRINITY - SPECIAL NEEDS$8,000
HARVEST PACK$6,250
UNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%INVOLVE MN: $8k → 6%UNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $45k → 14%UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $33k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Restored’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Restoredlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$724k · 9 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$724k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+131%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    Don Shire Ministries Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +18%
  • TR
    TEREBINTH REFUGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $134k · revenue +25%
  • AW
    AMNION WOMEN'S CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $98k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • UV
    URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONgraduated
    3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +55%
  • IM
    INVOLVE MNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +131%
  • PF
    PILOTS FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
3
House of Hope International

See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Church Transformation Network Inc

CTNs mission is to partner with national churches to economically and effectively train large numbers of Christian leaders in their calling character and ministry competency so that local communities of faith remain biblical faithful and…

Religion
5
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
6
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
7
Harvest University

Harvest university is committed to cultivating future ministers who will take the gospel to the ends of the earth. we offer online classes to train missionaries, pastors, and others who want to make an impact for christ through other…

Religion
8
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
9
Engage Hope Ministries

To glorify god by sharing the gospel and making disciples of jesus christ through partnerships with christian ministries in the countries we serve and through short-term mission trips that demonstrate the love of christ through…

International
10
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
11
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
12
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Evangelism Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Christian Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Support ServicesDisability Services & Suppo…Community Arts CentersAffordable Housing Developm…Pediatric Health Care Servi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%7%<5yr14%15%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%6%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr18%33%20–35yr14%15%35–55yr13%15%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
14%
2,854/20,873

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEREBINTH REFUGE — $134,000 · HealthTEREBINTH REFUGEAMNION WOMEN'S CENTER — $97,500 · HealthAMNION WOMEN'S CENTERMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $77,500 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge IncDon Shire Ministries Inc — $155,000 · ReligionDon Shire Ministries IncWOOD LAKE CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC — $45,500 · ReligionWOOD LAKE CAMP AND RETREAT CENT…CASSIA — $10,000 · ReligionPOLAND EVANGELICAL MISSION — $8,000 · ReligionWHISPERS OF HOPE — $85,000 · OtherWHISPERS OF HOPETRINITY EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF LAKEVILLE MINNESOTA — $28,000 · OtherTRINITY EVANGELICA…URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherURBAN VENTURES LEA…PILOTS FOR CHRIST — $7,000 · OtherPILOTS FOR CHRISTUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesUNION GOSPEL …INVOLVE MN — $7,500 · Human ServicesINVOLVE MNT-NET INTERNATIONAL — $16,000 · PhilanthropyHUNGER ENDS HERE — $6,250 · Food & NutritionUNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $6,000 · Education
Health$309,000Religion$218,500Other$130,000Human Services$92,500Philanthropy$16,000Food & Nutrition$6,250Education$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDon Shire Ministries Inc — $155,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetTEREBINTH REFUGE — $134,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetAMNION WOMEN'S CENTER — $97,500 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetWHISPERS OF HOPE — $85,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION ASSOCIATION OF ST PAUL INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD LAKE CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER INC — $45,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetT-NET INTERNATIONAL — $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCASSIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPOLAND EVANGELICAL MISSION — $8,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetINVOLVE MN — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUNGER ENDS HERE — $6,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN13.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Restored funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Restored?

    Find your warmest path to Restored through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $591k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph