Skip to content
Reach Resilience at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Reach Resilience

By advancing the work of Endeavors, Reach Resilience is committed to serving communities in crisis by activating allies, enabling change and elevating humanity through efforts that restore dignity, nurture confidence and empower perseverance.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$4.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$9.8MHuman Services$4.7MFood & Nutrition$1.0MYouth Development$746kHousing & Shelter$644kEducation$475kEmployment$205kHealth$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 36 grants below total $12,115,139, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,536,748 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $421,609 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $608k
  • $250k+7 grants · $11M
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$380M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc$4,595,000
Family Endeavors Inc$3,811,639
Feeding America$1,000,000
Haven for Hope of Bexar County$515,000
Spurs Give$500,000
Caring for Military Families - The Elizabeth Dole Foundation$450,000
Texas Tech Foundation Inc$280,000
Endeavors Unlimited$205,000
San Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc$150,000
Broken Men Foundation$103,000
United Way of North Carolina$100,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO INC$50,000
SAMMinistries$25,000
Soldiers To Sidelines$25,000
Corazon Ministries Inc$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Soldiers To Sidelines: $25k → 10%DePelchin Children's Center: $25k → 16%Corazon Ministries Inc: $25k → 16%Young Women's Christian Association DBA YMCA San Antonio: $250k → 16%Girls Incorporated of San Antonio: $3k → 16%Endeavors Unlimited: $205k → 16%Children's Bereavement Center of South Texas: $25k → 16%Spurs Give: $500k → 16%Therapeutic Justice Foundation: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CT
CA
VA
DE
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 5 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$4.9M
$613k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
-12%

Still filing today

100%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FE
    FAMILY ENDEAVORS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3.8M · revenue -28%
  • CF
    CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue -14%
  • HF
    Haven for Hope of Bexar County
    2× · 2023–2024 · $530k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -5%
  • MM
    MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -3%
  • DF
    DREEMS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
2
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
3
Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
4
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
5
Workforce Solutions Borderplex Inc

The organization's mission is to provide skilled workers for employers by advancing education, employment, entrepreneurship and economic development opportunities in support of global competitiveness and regional prosperity. as a workforce…

Employment
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
8
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
9
Sa Talent Inc Sa Works

The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…

Education
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
12
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County; the most unlike its peers is Cohen Veterans Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
6/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $9,595,000 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+6 more: $304,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY ENDEAVORS INC: $3,821,639 · OtherFAMILY ENDEAVORS INC+22 more: $693,000 · Other+22 moreSPURS GIVE: $500,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $250,000 · Human ServicesEndeavors Unlimited Inc: $205,000 · Human Services+6 more: $110,500 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $1,000,000 · Food & NutritionHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $530,000 · Housing & ShelterHFCC INC: $64,000 · Housing & ShelterCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $550,000 · Public BenefitTHE BOOT: $25,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 · EducationBRIGHTON CENTER: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$9,899,000Other$4,514,639Human Services$1,065,500Food & Nutrition$1,000,000Housing & Shelter$594,000Public Benefit$575,000Education$315,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $9,595,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY ENDEAVORS INC: $3,821,639 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $550,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $530,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSPURS GIVE: $500,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $280,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $250,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetEndeavors Unlimited Inc: $205,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBroken Men Foundation: $103,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHFCC INC: $64,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCorazon Ministries Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BOOT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRO PARTNERSHIP SAN ANTONIO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSoldiers to Sidelines: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER SAN ANTONIO AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOHEN VETERANS NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTFUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…John L Santikos Chari…St Luke's Lutheran He…Harvey E Najim Charit…United Way of San Ant…Methodist Healthcare …The Charity Ball Asso…The Texas Cavaliers C…Charitable Foundation…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Faye L & William L Co…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX36.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reach Resilience funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reach Resilience. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cohen Veterans Network Inc: 2% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reach Resilience?

Find your warmest path to Reach Resilience through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reach Resilience’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home