· Private foundation
Rar Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION AT UCLA | $100,000 |
| ELIZABETH HOUSE | $60,000 |
| SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC | $60,000 |
| SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH | $50,000 |
| CAMPBELL HALL | $50,000 |
| ASTORIAQUEENS SHARE-ING AND CARE-ING | $45,000 |
| OPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER | $45,000 |
| VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $45,000 |
| CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE | $45,000 |
| AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| HARVEST HOME | $40,000 |
| SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES | $30,000 |
| WATTS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHarvest Home Inc6× · 2018–2025 · $728k · revenue +161%
- TJTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $710k · revenue +50%
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC5× · 2017–2024 · $319k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- AHALEXANDRIA HOUSEone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +12%
- IMINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +9%
- ECESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +304%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
The specific purposes of this organization are:(a) to provide outpatient primary health service in underserved areas and/or for medically underserved populations as a community clinic. (b) to develop, promote, and manage health care…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
See schedule oour mission is to provide quality, affordable, community-sensitive health care and other services to the underserved communities of greater los angeles, regardless of their ability to pay, by upholding the legacy and…
TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.
Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.
Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Performance Zone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Harvest Home Inc ↗
- Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CONEJO FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ASTORIAQUEENS SHARE-ING AND CARE-ING INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PROJECT RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS AND HELPERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds WATTS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds ALMA BACKYARD FARM ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER RISING ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Rose Hills Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Deutsch Foundation · The Angell Foundation · Unihealth Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rar Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rar Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.