Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ramapo Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$564k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Health$8.0MHuman Services$2.7MReligion$907kPhilanthropy$530kFood & Nutrition$310kArts & Culture$211kCrime & Legal$60kHousing & Shelter$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $425k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES$100,000
EARLY ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION INC$30,000
RESPITE CARE CHARLESTON$20,000
FAMILYMEANS$20,000
INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYTIC TRAINING & RESEARCH INC$20,000
ALZHEIMER RESPITE & RESOURCE MEMORY MATTERS$20,000
OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC$20,000
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
HERE TO STAY WINTERGREEN$20,000
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC$20,000
SYRACUSE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$20,000
THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC$20,000
SHARE THE CARE INC$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC$20,000
ELDERWISE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC: $20k → 10%FAMILYMEANS: $20k → 6%LYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC: $20k → 14%THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $20k → 6%SERVICES NOW FOR ADULT PERSONS INC: $10k → 13%CHAUTAUQUA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $10k → 18%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $100k → 10%SHARE THE CARE INC: $20k → 13%MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER: $10k → 11%HIGH COUNTRY CAREGIVER FOUNDATION: $20k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $10k → 12%FAIRHILL PARTNERS: $10k → 17%HOPESPARKS: $10k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $20k → 11%HERE TO STAY WINTERGREEN: $20k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 23%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20k → 8%LYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%SUPPORTIVE OLDER WOMEN'S NETWORK: $25k → 22%MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20k → 6%SERVICES NOW FOR ADULT PERSONS INC: $10k → 13%SYRACUSE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 14%CHAUTAUQUA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $10k → 18%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $100k → 10%MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $10k → 12%FAIRHILL PARTNERS: $10k → 17%HOPESPARKS: $10k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTIONS PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 14%BRIGHT SIDE MANOR: $53k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $10k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 23%CONNECTEDLY: $10k → 22%MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER INC: $20k → 12%RESPITE CARE CHARLESTON: $20k → 12%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 10%OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC: $20k → 14%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $525k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $525k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $100k → 10%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1.3M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1.3M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 73 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

73 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
35

Total granted

$6.0M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+8%

Still filing today

71%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +20%
  • GU
    GENERATIONS UNITED INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +181%
  • EA
    EARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $85k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue +8%
  • NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue +165%
  • CJ
    CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF NAPLES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $750k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
2
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
3
Elderhouse Inc

Elderhouse promotes the health and wellbeing of aging adults through a holistic medical model adult day program led by a passionate team of therapeutic recreation professionals, health aides, and nurses specially trained to support the…

Human Services
4
Alzheimer's Family Services Center

To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.

—
5
Jewish Family and Children's Services

Jewish family and children's services exists to provide professional and volunteer services for the purposes of developing, restoring, and maintaining the competency of families and individuals of all ages. traditionally, jewish family and…

Human Services
6
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
7
Asian Community Center of Sacramento Valley Inc Dba Acc Senior Services

The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…

Health
8
Jfs Care

Jfs care, a california non-profit benefit corporation, was founded in 2011 with the primary purpose of providing in-home care services to individuals and families, and to connect those individuals and families with additional services. jfs…

Religion
9
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services
10
Jewish Family Home Care Inc

Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…

Health
11
J R Coleman Senior Outreach

To enrich lives through engaging seniors and strengthening community.

—
12
Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc

Strengthen and support individuals and families and to address the social service needs of our diverse and changing communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Shore Senior Center and the most unlike its peers is Kids Kin N Caregivers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Jewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Independent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/93
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,472

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/85
Grantees still filing
49/85
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $2,500,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC — $1,350,000 · Human ServicesBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC+41 more — $935,042 · Human Services+41 moreNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $2,500,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC+11 more — $413,500 · Health+11 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $2,500,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICI…+1 more — $20,000 · EducationCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF NAPLES INC — $750,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTE…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY F…+55 more — $1,163,996 · Other+55 moreGENERATIONS UNITED INC — $160,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK CARES INC — $10,020 · PhilanthropyMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL — $10,000 · PhilanthropyARTIS-NAPLES INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $65,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$4,785,042Health$2,913,500Education$2,520,000Other$2,163,996Philanthropy$280,020Arts & Culture$125,000Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $2,500,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC — $1,350,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGENERATIONS UNITED INC — $160,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYTICAL TRAINING & RESEARCH INC — $80,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGERIATRIC SERVICES INC — $63,799 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES — $48,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetINNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR DISADVANTAGE AND DISABILITY INC — $48,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCONNECTEDLY — $45,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHELPING AND LENDING OUTREACH SUPPORT — $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetRESPITE CARE OF CHARLESTON — $40,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONEGENERATION — $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING — $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe ARK of SC — $32,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF UTAH — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Human Services — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER INC — $22,500 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSYRACUSE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPICA ADULT DAY PROGRAM & COUNSELING CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMilwaukie Community Center Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetGrand Family Coalition Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetJackson County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMIGOS DEL VALLE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAGNOLIA MEMORY CARE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brookdale Foundat…Alzheimer's Foundatio…Sephardic Home for th…National Council on A…Meals on Wheels Ameri…FjcDominion Energy Chari…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Synchrony FoundationCalifornia Community …Baird Foundation IncSeattle Foundation
The Brookdale FoundationNJ22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brookdale Foundation · Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc · Sephardic Home for the Aged Foundation Dba the Sephardic Foundation on Aging · National Council on Aging Inc · Meals on Wheels America · Fjc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Synchrony Foundation · California Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ramapo Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey — 43% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj — 1% of income from government
  • Maria Seymour Brooker Memorial — 1% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ramapo Trust?

Find your warmest path to Ramapo Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines