Skip to content
Ramapo Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Ramapo Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$564k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$8.0MHuman Services$2.7MReligion$907kPhilanthropy$530kFood & Nutrition$310kArts & Culture$211kCrime & Legal$60kHousing & Shelter$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $425k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES$100,000
EARLY ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION INC$30,000
SYRACUSE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$20,000
OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC$20,000
HERE TO STAY WINTERGREEN$20,000
FAMILYMEANS$20,000
SHARE THE CARE INC$20,000
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC$20,000
ELDERWISE$20,000
RESPITE CARE CHARLESTON$20,000
INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYTIC TRAINING & RESEARCH INC$20,000
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
ALZHEIMER RESPITE & RESOURCE MEMORY MATTERS$20,000
THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC: $20k → 10%FAMILYMEANS: $20k → 6%LYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC: $20k → 14%THE MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $20k → 6%SERVICES NOW FOR ADULT PERSONS INC: $10k → 13%CHAUTAUQUA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $10k → 18%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $100k → 10%SHARE THE CARE INC: $20k → 13%MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER: $10k → 11%HIGH COUNTRY CAREGIVER FOUNDATION: $20k → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $10k → 12%FAIRHILL PARTNERS: $10k → 17%HOPESPARKS: $10k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $20k → 11%HERE TO STAY WINTERGREEN: $20k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 23%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $20k → 8%LYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%SUPPORTIVE OLDER WOMEN'S NETWORK: $25k → 22%MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20k → 6%SERVICES NOW FOR ADULT PERSONS INC: $10k → 13%SYRACUSE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 14%CHAUTAUQUA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $10k → 18%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $100k → 10%MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $10k → 12%FAIRHILL PARTNERS: $10k → 17%HOPESPARKS: $10k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTIONS PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 14%BRIGHT SIDE MANOR: $53k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $10k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 23%CONNECTEDLY: $10k → 22%MID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER INC: $20k → 12%RESPITE CARE CHARLESTON: $20k → 12%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $25k → 10%OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC: $20k → 14%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $525k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $525k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS INC: $100k → 10%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1.3M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1.3M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 73 repeat orgs$6.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
35

Total granted

$6.0M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+8%

Still filing today

71%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +20%
  • GU
    GENERATIONS UNITED INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +181%
  • EA
    EARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $85k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue +721%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M · revenue +8%
  • CJ
    CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF NAPLES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $750k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
2
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
3
Elderhouse Inc

Elderhouse promotes the health and wellbeing of aging adults through a holistic medical model adult day program led by a passionate team of therapeutic recreation professionals, health aides, and nurses specially trained to support the…

Human Services
4
Alzheimer's Family Services Center

To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.

—
5
Jewish Family and Children's Services

Jewish family and children's services exists to provide professional and volunteer services for the purposes of developing, restoring, and maintaining the competency of families and individuals of all ages. traditionally, jewish family and…

Human Services
6
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
7
Asian Community Center of Sacramento Valley Inc Dba Acc Senior Services

The asian community center of sacramento valley's mission is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for our community by identifying, developing, and providing culturally sensitive health and social services for…

Health
8
Jfs Care

Jfs care, a california non-profit benefit corporation, was founded in 2011 with the primary purpose of providing in-home care services to individuals and families, and to connect those individuals and families with additional services. jfs…

Religion
9
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services
10
Jewish Family Home Care Inc

Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…

Health
11
J R Coleman Senior Outreach

To enrich lives through engaging seniors and strengthening community.

—
12
Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc

Strengthen and support individuals and families and to address the social service needs of our diverse and changing communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Shore Senior Center; the most unlike its peers is Kids Kin N Caregivers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/85
Grantees still filing
48/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,500,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $1,350,000 · Human ServicesBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC+41 more: $935,042 · Human Services+41 moreNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $2,500,000 · HealthNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC+11 more: $413,500 · Health+11 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,500,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICI…+1 more: $20,000 · EducationCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF NAPLES INC: $750,000 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTE…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY F…+55 more: $1,163,996 · Other+55 moreGENERATIONS UNITED INC: $160,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK CARES INC: $10,020 · PhilanthropyMARIA SEYMOUR BROOKER MEMORIAL: $10,000 · PhilanthropyARTIS-NAPLES INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $65,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$4,785,042Health$2,913,500Education$2,520,000Other$2,163,996Philanthropy$280,020Arts & Culture$125,000Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,500,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $1,350,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGENERATIONS UNITED INC: $160,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYTICAL TRAINING & RESEARCH INC: $80,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGERIATRIC SERVICES INC: $63,799 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: $48,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetINNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR DISADVANTAGE AND DISABILITY INC: $48,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCONNECTEDLY: $45,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHELPING AND LENDING OUTREACH SUPPORT: $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRESPITE CARE OF CHARLESTON: $40,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONEGENERATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe ARK of SC: $32,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWISE AND HEALTHY AGING: $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLYNGBLOMSTEN SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Human Services: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMID-ISLAND Y JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALATINE TOWNSHIP SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJackson County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILYMEANS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHere To Stay Wintergreen: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMilwaukie Community Center Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCENTRAL ILLINOIS AGENCY ON AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brookdale Foundat…Alzheimer's Foundatio…Sephardic Home for th…National Council on A…Meals on Wheels Ameri…FjcDominion Energy Chari…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Synchrony FoundationCalifornia Community …Baird Foundation IncSeattle Foundation
The Brookdale FoundationNJ22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brookdale Foundation · Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc · Sephardic Home for the Aged Foundation Dba the Sephardic Foundation on Aging · National Council on Aging Inc · Meals on Wheels America · Fjc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Synchrony Foundation · California Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ramapo Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ramapo Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc: 69% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey: 43% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj: 1% of income from government
  • Maria Seymour Brooker Memorial: 1% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ramapo Trust?

Find your warmest path to Ramapo Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ramapo’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home