· Public charity
Race Forward
RACE FORWARD supports communities and public institutions to achieve a just multiracial democratic society through governance that advances social justice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $320k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST ATLANTA WATERSHED ALLIANCE | $80,000 |
| EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL | $80,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE | $80,000 |
| FOOD FOR THE SPIRIT INC | $80,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTIC | $40,000 |
| THE MICHAEL BROWN SR CHOSEN FOR CH | $30,000 |
| CAIR-SV | $20,000 |
| OLNEYVILLE HOUSING CORPORATION | $15,000 |
| HUMANS OF ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| THE SOPHIA PROJECT | $10,000 |
| THE MISSION ATTEMPT | $10,000 |
| FREEDOM COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| JAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY | $8,626 |
| ACCE INSTITUTE | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $357k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY3× · 2018–2020 · $600k · revenue +197%
- EDEMPOWER DC3× · 2018–2020 · $600k · revenue +88%
- WAWest Atlanta Watershed Alliance3× · 2022–2024 · $240k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- RFRACE FORWARD ACTION INCone grant, 2023 · $500k · 99% of their budget
Americans for the Arts Incone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -11%- VPVESPERNINA PLACE INCone grant, 2023 · $145k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement
The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Opportunity Agenda Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humans of St Louis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY ↗
- Who funds PUGET SOUND SAGE ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
- Who funds RACE FORWARD ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Americans for the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds West Atlanta Watershed Alliance ↗
- Who funds EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds Open Buffalo Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds NAA KAANI NATIVE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Parent Leadership Action Network PLAN ↗
- Who funds NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CO-OP ED CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK INC ↗
- Who funds Make The Road States Inc ↗
- Who funds 482 FORWARD ↗
- Who funds Education Justice Alliance ↗
- Who funds CVPE EDUCATIONAL FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WE ARE DOWN HOME ↗
- Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY AGENDA INC ↗
- Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE MEDIA ↗
- Who funds INADVANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · The Schott Foundation for Public Education · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Tides Center · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Surdna Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · The Ford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Race Forward funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.