Skip to content

· Private foundation

PY Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$8.5MEducation$8.5MRecreation & Sports$8.2MArts & Culture$5.1MHousing & Shelter$3.9MHealth$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.1MEnvironment$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $692k
  • $250k+5 grants · $12M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Artesia Recreation Center Foundation$5,900,000
Eddy County Fair Association$3,800,000
SW Foundation for Osteopathic$1,675,000
Greater Artesia Foundation$404,996
City of Artesia$399,000
Artesia Public Schools$211,820
West Texas Counseling & Guidance Inc$180,000
Artesia Classical Academy Inc$100,000
Artesia MainStreet Inc$100,000
Haven of Hope Inc$100,000
City of Artesia$32,000
Hagerman Municipal Schools$28,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
New Mexico Mounted Patrol$25,000
Imagine New Mexico$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 49% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 16%University of Texas at Austin: $1.0M → 10%West Texas Counseling & Guidance Inc: $180k → 13%Literacy Coalition of the Permian Basin: $50k → 14%UMC Foundation: $500k → 17%El Progreso Library: $18k → 25%ARTESIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $397k → 13%University of the Southwest: $10k → 19%Boy Scouts of America: $200k → 19%Chaves County Casa: $25k → 20%SW Foundation for Osteopathic: $1.7M → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $360k → 13%BSA - Philmont Scout Ranch: $200k → 19%Hagerman Public Schools: $54k → 20%SW Fdn for Osteopathic Educat Resea: $800k → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $248k → 13%BSA - Philmont Scout Ranch: $200k → 19%Hagerman Municipal Schools: $28k → 20%SW Foundation for Osteopathic Education: $800k → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $230k → 13%Boy Scouts of America - Philmont Scout Ranch: $100k → 19%Lake Arthur Municipal Schools: $139k → 20%SW Foundation for Osteopathic: $800k → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $212k → 13%Boy Scouts of America - Philmont Scout Ranch: $100k → 19%Lake Arthur Municipal Schools: $12k → 20%SW Foundation for Osteopathic: $800k → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $187k → 13%Boy Scouts of America - Philmont Scout Ranch: $100k → 19%SW Foundation for Osteopathic Education: $800k → 23%Artesia General Hospital Foundation: $156k → 13%Boy Scouts of America - Philmont Scout Ranch: $100k → 19%SW Foundation for Osteopathic Education: $75k → 23%Artesia Public Schools: $105k → 13%Haven of Hope Inc: $100k → 13%Artesia Public Schools: $97k → 13%Artesia General Hospital Foundation: $52k → 13%Artesia Public Schools: $50k → 13%Artesia Public Schools: $38k → 13%Artesia Public Schools: $19k → 13%Artesia Public Schools: $9k → 13%Eddy County Fair Association: $3.8M → 13%Eddy County Fair Association: $500k → 13%Carlsbad Lifehouse Inc: $50k → 13%Inspired By Science: $23k → 13%Landsun Homes Inc: $15k → 13%Inspired By Science: $15k → 13%LANDSUN HOMES INC: $13k → 13%Inspired By Science: $11k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of PY Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 78%.

PY Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 28 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$36M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+18%

Still filing today

46%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    Artesia Recreation Center Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +142% · 39% of their budget
  • AM
    ARTESIA MAINSTREET INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $900k · revenue +16% · 44% of their budget
  • AG
    ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $208k · revenue +78% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Texas at Austin
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • SF
    SW Fdn for Osteopathic Educat Resea
    one grant, 2020 · $800k
  • UF
    UMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artesia Emergency Relief

Emergency charitable relief

—
2
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
3
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
4
Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc

The mission of the Arts Council is to nurture and strengthen the artistic, cultural and educational quality of the community.

Arts & Culture
5
Laredo Area Community Foundation

To inspire by generosity and empower by a legacy of giving, the Laredo Area Community Foundation provides for the philanthropic needs of Laredo and surrounding communities.

Philanthropy
6
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
7
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
8
Andalusia Foundation
—
9
New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence

The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.

Health
10
Astrophysical Research Consortium

Astrophysical Research Consortium operates two telescopes at the Apache Point Observatory. There is a 3.5-meter general purpose telescope and a survey specialized 2.5-meter Sloan Foundation telescope. The telescopes have distinct purposes…

Science & Tech
11
Port Aransas Art Center

To provide a place where artists and art patrons may gather to encourage, educate and support one another in a pleasant atmosphere. artists from all over texas as well as out-of-state visitors enjoy displaying art and offer artistic…

Arts & Culture
12
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artesia General Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Written in Red Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Artesia: $8,546,917 · OtherCity of ArtesiaARTESIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,973,598 · OtherARTESIA PUBLIC SCHOOLSARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,793,164 · OtherARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATIONSW Foundation for Osteopathic Education: $1,675,000 · OtherSW Foundation for Osteopathic EducationUniversity of Texas at Austin: $1,000,000 · OtherSW Fdn for Osteopathic Educat Resea: $800,000 · Other+25 more: $3,187,136 · Other+25 moreArtesia Recreation Center Foundation: $6,400,000 · PhilanthropyArtesia Recreation…+2 more: $32,500 · PhilanthropyEDDY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $4,300,000 · Arts & CultureEDDY COUNTY …SW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC: $3,275,000 · EducationSW FOUNDATI…Artesia Classical Academy Inc: $460,805 · EducationArtesia Cla…ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $208,000 · Education+3 more: $120,240 · EducationHAVEN OF HOPE INC: $3,708,724 · Housing & ShelterHAVEN OF H…ARTESIA MAINSTREET INC: $900,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $25,000 · Community ImprovementUMC FOUNDATION: $500,000 · HealthWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $180,000 · HealthCARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC: $50,500 · Health+1 more: $6,000 · Health
Other$18,975,815Philanthropy$6,432,500Arts & Culture$4,300,000Education$4,064,045Housing & Shelter$3,708,724Community Improvement$925,000Health$736,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetArtesia Recreation Center Foundation: $6,400,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetEDDY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $4,300,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE INC: $3,708,724 over 5y, 59% of budgetSW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC: $3,275,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,793,164 over 2y, 14% of budgetARTESIA MAINSTREET INC: $900,000 over 6y, 44% of budgetUMC FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION: $473,596 over 4y, 76% of budgetArtesia Arts Council Inc: $470,772 over 5y, 51% of budgetArtesia Classical Academy Inc: $460,805 over 4y, 51% of budgetARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $208,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetCHANGING LIVES COALITION INC: $197,750 over 5y, 34% of budgetINSPIRED BY SCIENCE: $56,040 over 4y, 24% of budgetLITERACY COALITION OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $54,200 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetCARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC: $50,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLANDSUN HOMES INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMAGINE NEW MEXICO: $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetArtesia Youth Soccer Association: $22,590 over 2y, 13% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PROGRESO LIBRARY: $18,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Eddy County: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRITTEN IN RED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Artesia Recreation Center Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EDDY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SW FOUNDATION FOR OSTEOPATHIC ↗
  • Who funds ARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTESIA MAINSTREET INC ↗
  • Who funds UMC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Artesia Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Artesia Classical Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHANGING LIVES COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRED BY SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COALITION OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds CARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDSUN HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds Artesia Youth Soccer Association ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL PROGRESO LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Written in Red IncNM30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Written in Red Inc · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · The Estelle H Yates Foundation · Tlc Foundation From the Heart · SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation · Frank W Yates Jr Family Foundation · John a and Charlotte G Yates Legacy Foundation · Artesia General Hospital · JF Maddox Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · United Way of Eddy County · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization PY Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from PY Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to PY Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to PY Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on PY’s filings →

    More from the funding graph