Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Artesia General Hospital

To provide health care to the families of artesia and surrounding communities while continually improving quality of patient care and utilizing resources effectively and efficiently.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$165kArts & Culture$41kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$28kCommunity Improvement$17k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $11,580 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $31,920 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,340 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$11,580
Median grant
1
States reached
$91M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$11,580
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARTESIA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $12k → 13%ARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12k → 13%UNITED WAY: $10k → 13%UNITED WAY: $10k → 13%ARTESIA ARTS COUNCIL: $10k → 13%ARTESIA ARTS COUNCIL: $10k → 13%UNITED WAY: $10k → 13%ARTESIA MAIN STREET: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Artesia Emergency Relief

Emergency charitable relief

2
Artesia Recreation Center Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Artemis Foundation
4
Artesia Historical Society

The historical society was formed with the mission to promote public interest and to preserve and protect the archives and historic sites of the city of artesia.

Arts & Culture
5
Andalusia Foundation
6
Arterberry Foundation
Religion
7
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
8
Artezona Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art Inc

To promote armenian contemporary experimental art

Arts & Culture
10
The Arsenault Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
11
Armenian Sports Hall of Fame
12
Casa Dolores Co Claudia Mclaughlin
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artesia Arts Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Artesia Aquatic Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 · OtherARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATIONCity of Artesia — $165,000 · OtherCity of Artesia+3 more — $71,580 · OtherARTESIA COMMUNITY CHEST — $30,000 · PhilanthropyEDDY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION — $9,200 · Arts & CultureARTESIA MAINSTREET INC — $5,129 · Community ImprovementArtesia FFA Pardners Inc — $5,100 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,736,580Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$9,200Community Improvement$5,129Membership Benefit$5,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetArtesia Arts Council Inc — $32,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetARTESIA COMMUNITY CHEST — $30,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $11,580 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARTESIA MAINSTREET INC — $5,129 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PY FoundationNM15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PY Foundation · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Artesia General Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $18k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph