Skip to content

California · Public charity

Project Redwood

PROJECT REDWOOD's mission is to provide funding, expertise, and connections to social entrepreneurs who address the challenge of global poverty.

$912k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Itemized grants FY2025
25
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$840k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,500
States reached, FY2025
12
Total assets, FY2025
$560k
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

International$825kCommunity Improvement$326kEducation$315kYouth Development$275kCrime & Legal$90kPhilanthropy$70kFood & Nutrition$45k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AZ
NC
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 30 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Project Redwood supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 28 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRead 718 Inc: $95,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTomorrows Leaders NYC: $95,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMortar Cincinnati: $90,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWomen Initiating Success Envisioned Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetBuild Our Lives Together Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetGary Comer Youth Center Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Somo Project: $75,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetEducate2Envision International Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetBreaking the Chain Through Education Inc: $70,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetAsociacion Kantaya Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetThrive-Gulu Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetOnevillage Partners: $70,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetProject Hope & Fairness Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetWorld Connect Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHatua Networkinc: $70,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetGirls Gotta Run Foundation Incorporated: $70,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetKiwimbi Internationala New Jersey Non Profit Corporation: $70,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetAgape - Heart International Organization: $65,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetJuma Ventures Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAndean Alliance for Sustainable Development: $45,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetVocal Justice: $40,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetSoul Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLooma Education Corporation: $40,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetResonate Workshops: $40,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHero Women Rising Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCongo Leadership Initiative Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAwamaki US: $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMaia: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 28.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides CenterCA28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Center · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Project Redwood with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Project Redwood?

Find your warmest path to Project Redwood through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Project Redwood

How much does Project Redwood give?
Project Redwood reported 26 itemized grants totaling $840,000, out of $911,500 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Project Redwood fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (42%), Community Improvement (17%), Education (16%).
Who are Project Redwood's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Read 718 Inc ($95k), Tomorrows Leaders NYC ($95k), Mortar Cincinnati ($91k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Project Redwood?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Tides Center, Impactassetsinc, Silicon Valley Community Foundation.
Where is Project Redwood based?
Project Redwood is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Project Redwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph