Skip to content

· Private foundation

Project 58

PROJECT 58 is a christian nonprofit organization that desires to promte the gospel of jesus christ by ministering to the spiritual and physical needs of the people within and around north carolina.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.0MArts & Culture$274kHealth$198kHuman Services$180kInternational$154kCrime & Legal$32kPhilanthropy$29kHousing & Shelter$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$800
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUGIT OUTREACH MINISTRIES$2,060
TIKKUN INTERNATIONAL$2,000
ENERGIZE MINISTRIES$1,000
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM$800
THE FEED FOUNDATION$750
MISCELLANEOUS$600
GOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION$480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SALEM PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $5k → 15%SEVEN HOMES INC: $5k → 16%SEVEN HOMES: $624 → 16%SEVEN HOMES INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CO
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 36 repeat orgs$569k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
41

Total granted

$2.6M
$567k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+4%

Still filing today

44%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $111k · revenue +13%
  • GI
    Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $70k · revenue +73%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • GM
    GOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • HC
    HOPE CITY
    one grant, 2023 · $93k
  • M
    MISC
    one grant, 2023 · $86k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
2
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Global Mobilization Ministries Inc

To support christian ministries throughout the world

Religion
5
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
6
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
10
Ransomed Heart Ministries

This organization exists to restore men and women to live from their heart - as God's intimate allies - by recovering the treasure of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, entrusting that message to the people who have been transformed by it, and to…

Religion
11
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
12
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPECITY CHURCH: $1,379,050 · OtherHOPECITY CHURCHHOPE CITY CHURCH: $353,782 · OtherHOPE CITY CHURCHGOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDTIONS: $250,000 · OtherGOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION FOUNDTIONSHANDS AND FEET PROJECT: $150,500 · OtherOTHERS UNDER 5000: $111,598 · Other+55 more: $618,989 · Other+55 moreHANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC: $110,500 · Human ServicesSEVEN HOMES INC: $11,074 · Human ServicesSalem Pregnancy Support Center Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $70,000 · ReligionENERGIZE MINISTRIES INC: $16,440 · ReligionTriad Coalition for Life: $12,500 · ReligionThe Premier Foundation: $5,463 · ReligionMotor Racing Outreach Inc: $5,200 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM - USA INC: $5,000 · Religion+2 more: $2,900 · ReligionGLOBAL OUTREACH INC: $10,000 · InternationalONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,410 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalFEED FOUNDATION INC: $750 · InternationalTHE PASTORS PANTRY TARGETING SENIOR HUNGER: $7,500 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE PREGNANCY NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthGOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $13,502 · Arts & CultureNOT FORGOTTEN MINISTRIES: $12,043 · Civil Rights
Other$2,863,919Human Services$126,574Religion$117,503International$21,160Health$17,500Arts & Culture$13,502Civil Rights$12,043

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC: $110,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $70,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENERGIZE MINISTRIES INC: $16,440 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetGOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $13,502 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetTriad Coalition for Life: $12,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNOT FORGOTTEN MINISTRIES: $12,043 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetFORSYTH JAIL AND PRISON MINISTRIES: $11,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSEVEN HOMES INC: $11,074 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PASTORS PANTRY TARGETING SENIOR HUNGER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS 1ST: $6,900 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe Premier Foundation: $5,463 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMotor Racing Outreach Inc: $5,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Davidson County Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN EMBASSY JERUSALEM - USA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSalem Pregnancy Support Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetReconciliation Ministries Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMISSION INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANDS AND FEET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds ENERGIZE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSPEL MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Triad Coalition for Life ↗
  • Who funds NOT FORGOTTEN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FORSYTH JAIL AND PRISON MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PASTORS PANTRY TARGETING SENIOR HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS 1ST ↗
  • Who funds The Premier Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO18.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project 58 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project 58. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Project 58?

    Find your warmest path to Project 58 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Project 58’s filings →

    More from the funding graph