Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$579k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.0MPublic Benefit$1.9MPhilanthropy$590kEducation$537kCommunity Improvement$257kHuman Services$224kHousing & Shelter$191kFood & Nutrition$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $735,235 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,050,307 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $315,072 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $579k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIO ARRIBA COUNTY MILL LEVY$578,516
ALBUQ HLTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS$50,000
UNITED WAY$15,400
WESST$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$12,500
CNM INGENUITY INC$10,000
BOSQUE SCHOOL$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
ALL FAITHS RECEIVING HOME$7,500
RIO RANCHO ROTARY SUNRISE FOUND$7,500
NATIVE HEALTH INITIATIVE$7,000
SANTA FE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,069
THE BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NM$5,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $69k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $51k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES ASFNM: $8k → 14%ARCHDIOSESE OF SANTA FE: $10k → 14%ARCHDIOSESE OF SANTA FE: $10k → 14%WESST: $23k → 14%WESST: $23k → 14%WESST: $20k → 14%WESST: $15k → 14%WESST: $13k → 14%WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $10k → 14%WESST: $7k → 14%ALL FAITHS RECEIVING HOME: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 23 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$6.5M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+29%

Still filing today

87%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $745k · revenue +22%
  • AH
    ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $471k · revenue +40%
  • EC
    EL CENTRO FAMILY HEALTH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $303k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • LC
    LINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.6M · revenue -99% · 95% of their budget
  • CF
    CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF PARKERSBURG
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
3
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
4
New Mexico Construction Alliance

As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…

—
5
New Mexico Association for Home and

The organization serves its membership through advocacy, networking, education, and communication by promoting success and best practices for home care, hospice, and related home health support services.

—
6
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
7
National Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for New Mexicans who suffer from mental illness.

—
8
Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of Commerce

The albuquerque hispano chamber of commerce (ahcc) is organized to promote economic development, to enhance economic opportunities, and to provide business and workplace education with an emphasis on hispanic and small business community…

—
9
American Indian Chamber of Commerce of Nm

To promote business and economic growth through business development, capacity building, workforce development, research & policy, and education initiatives and activities. in addition to our membership, our focused constituency includes…

Community Improvement
10
University of New Mexico Alumni Association

The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…

Education
11
New Mexico Health Care Association

Gaining public recognition of services provided by the long-term care industry. provide education to long-term care providers. represent members in legislative and regulatory areas. development & implementation of industry standards.

—
12
New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc

The mission of the new mexico rural electric cooperatives (nmrec) is to advance protect and advocate member interests.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln County Medical Center Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr12%6%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr18%37%35–55yr14%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr12%1%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr17%51%20–35yr18%41%35–55yr14%6%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
11%
799/6,978

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIO ARRIVA COUNTY MILL LEVY DONATION — $3,511,318 · OtherRIO ARRIVA COUNTY MILL LEVY DONATIONNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY — $480,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO DE RIO ARRIBA — $302,641 · OtherLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO DE RIO ARRIBA+14 more — $187,379 · OtherLINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $1,571,950 · HealthLINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI…Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation — $744,500 · HealthPresbyterian Healthcare FoundationEL CENTRO FAMILY HEALTH — $302,641 · HealthEL CENTRO FAMILY HEALTHLAS CLINICAS DEL NORTE INC — $135,511 · Health+8 more — $237,211 · Health+8 moreALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $471,325 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $110,000 · Human Services+4 more — $41,000 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF EASTERN NM — $56,314 · Philanthropy+4 more — $43,900 · PhilanthropyMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $42,550 · Food & NutritionBosque School — $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $10,000 · EducationNative Health Initiative — $7,000 · EducationSANTA FE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $11,561 · Community ImprovementALBUQUERQUE REGIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO — $5,750 · Community ImprovementHEADING HOME — $25,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,481,338Health$2,991,813Human Services$622,325Philanthropy$600,214Food & Nutrition$42,550Education$37,000Community Improvement$27,311Housing & Shelter$25,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLINCOLN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $1,571,950 over 1y, 95% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation — $744,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $471,325 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetEL CENTRO FAMILY HEALTH — $302,641 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO DE RIO ARRIBA — $302,641 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetLAS CLINICAS DEL NORTE INC — $135,511 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $110,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNAMI National — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EASTERN NM — $56,314 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $53,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence — $52,675 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $42,550 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSANDOVAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $29,129 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $29,036 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $25,650 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHEADING HOME — $25,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBosque School — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $15,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $11,561 over 2y, 10% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCNM INGENUITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUALITY NEW MEXICO — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEW MEXICO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALBUQUERQUE REGIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNICA — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNative Health Initiative — $7,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCASA ESPERANZA INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO — $5,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRio Rancho Chamber of Commerce — $5,400 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $5,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Santa Fe Community Fo…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Nusenda FoundationNancy Ann Mellen Foun…Con Alma Health Found…New Mexico Community …Pnm Tnmp FoundationThe Frost FoundationClub Culturale Italia…King-Carpenter Founda…Delta Dental Plan of …
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM33.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Club Culturale Italiano Inc · King-Carpenter Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of New Mexico Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Presbyterian Healthcare Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home