Skip to content

· Private foundation

Porter E & Helenmae Thompson Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$237k
Granted FY2021
20
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$22k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Porter E & Helenmae Thompson Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Greater Horizons, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Porter E & Helenmae Thompson Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $237k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’17
17
’18
16
’19
17
’20
16
’21
0
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$4.2MHealth$339kEducation$125kHuman Services$125kReligion$102kEnvironment$100kInternational$76kPublic Benefit$48kOther$0
02FY2021 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k9 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $164k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANTHONY'S FOUNDATION$22,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$17,000
BERKELEY FOUNDATION$17,000
FOUNDATION FOR NUEROLOGIC DISEASES$17,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$17,000
QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$16,000
ALDEA INC$14,000
CURE ALZHEIMERS FUND$12,000
ARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF$12,000
GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY$10,000
HIGH DESERT MUSEUM$10,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$9,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - EAST BAY$8,000
EPIPHANY CENTER$8,000
HOSPICE BY THE BAY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $8k → 8%ALDEA INC: $14k → 9%EPIPHANY CENTER: $8k → 10%LEARNING ALLY: $6k → 11%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $6k → 8%ALDEA INC: $12k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $8k → 9%EPIPHANY CENTER: $6k → 10%LEARNING ALLY: $6k → 11%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $6k → 8%ALDEA INC: $12k → 9%EPIPHANY CENTER: $6k → 10%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $6k → 8%ALDEA INC: $12k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $6k → 9%EPIPHANY CENTER: $6k → 10%HOSPICE BY THE BAY: $6k → 8%ALDEA INC: $11k → 9%EPIPHANY CENTER: $6k → 10%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $6k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $6k → 9%HOSPICE OF THE EAST BAY: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
MO
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$998k · 23 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down. Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$998k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+43%

Still filing today

74%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPublic BenefitEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $76k · revenue +412%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $76k · revenue +98%
  • AI
    ALDEA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $61k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • RH
    REGIONS HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +43%
  • CO
    City of Oakland OPRYD
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • DS
    DESERT SAGE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
10
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Institute for Systems Biology

Non-profit research institute to advance a systems (or holistic and cross-disciplinary) approach to science; personalized medicine; global health & environmental sustainability; science education; & the pioneering & invention of biological…

Science & Tech
12
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is By the Bay Health; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Greater Horizons: $4,213,656 · PhilanthropyGreater HorizonsST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $102,000 · OtherST ANTHONY…ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $76,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $44,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $36,000 · OtherGALAPAGOS …SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $32,000 · OtherSPECIAL OL…BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherBERKELEY F…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $32,000 · OtherTHE NATURE…SECOND START ADULT LITERACY PR: $26,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $32,000 · OtherHABITAT FO…GREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE: $32,000 · OtherGREENBELT …HIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $30,000 · OtherHIGH DESER…+3 more: $27,000 · Other+3 moreALDEA INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $32,000 · Human ServicesBY THE BAY HEALTH: $32,000 · Human ServicesMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $32,000 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc: $12,000 · Human ServicesFoundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc: $76,000 · HealthQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $72,300 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $37,000 · HealthREGIONS HOSPITAL: $14,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $76,000 · InternationalARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF: $48,000 · Public BenefitTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $34,000 · Education
Philanthropy$4,213,656Other$501,000Human Services$201,000Health$199,300International$76,000Public Benefit$48,000Education$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Horizons: $4,213,656 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFoundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc: $76,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $76,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $72,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALDEA INC: $61,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE: $32,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMount St Joseph-St Elizabeth: $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST GRADUATE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Greater Horizons ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Neurologic Diseases Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALDEA INC ↗
  • Who funds ARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBELT ALLIANCEPEOPLE FOR OPEN SPACE ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Mount St Joseph-St Elizabeth ↗
  • Who funds HIGH DESERT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds FIRST GRADUATE ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Porter E & Helenmae Thompson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Porter E & Helenmae Thompson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • High Desert Museum: 11% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Porter E & Helenmae Thompson’s filings →

More from the funding graph