Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc

The mission of PPFA shall be to provide leadership in: (a) ensuring the provision of comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual; (b) advocating public policies (continued on schedule o)

$181M
Granted FY2025still arriving
102
Grants FY2025still arriving
34
States reached
$16M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.4BCivil Rights$4.3MPhilanthropy$2.0MPublic Benefit$316kInternational$260kEducation$245kCommunity Improvement$223kEnvironment$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $634k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+57 grants · $178M
$1,234,029
Median grant
34
States reached
$456M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Planned Parenthood Global$16,362,871
Planned Parenthood of Greater New York Inc$10,645,556
BetterHealth A Planned Parenthood Partnership$8,075,409
Planned Parenthood North Central States$6,621,980
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest Hawaii Alaska Indiana Kentucky$6,537,618
Planned Parenthood Southeast Inc$6,168,932
Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains Inc$6,168,049
Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio$6,130,106
Planned Parenthood Mar Monte Inc$5,233,921
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington DC Inc$4,823,373
Planned Parenthood of Florida Inc$4,467,457
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic$4,238,276
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc$4,169,399
Planned Parenthood of Illinois$3,855,387
Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania$3,453,153
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S MEDICAL FUND: $50k → 22%Planned Parenthood Advocates of Texas: $395k → 10%Bold Futures NM: $50k → 14%HEART WOMEN & GIRLS: $20k → 14%PP ADVOCATES OF TEXAS: $346k → 10%BOLD FUTURES NM: $40k → 14%PP ADVOCATES OF TEXAS: $306k → 10%Young Women United: $15k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%PP ADVOCATES OF TEXAS: $210k → 10%FAITH CHOICE OHIO: $40k → 15%PP ADVOCATES OF TEXAS: $205k → 10%Planned Parenthood Advocates of Texas: $163k → 10%Planned Parenthood Advocates of Texas: $162k → 10%Planned Parenthood Advocates of Texas: $154k → 10%SOUTHERN BIRTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $50k → 15%Instituto Lab: $50k → 11%THE AFIYA CENTER: $41k → 14%THE AFIYA CENTER: $30k → 14%SISTERSONG: $50k → 13%THE AFIYA CENTER: $30k → 14%The Afiya Center: $14k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 17%THE GATHERING FOR JUSTICE INC: $50k → 17%End Rape on Campus Inc: $10k → 14%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $35k → 17%THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TE: $500k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP & ADVANCEMENT: $30k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP & ADVANCEMENT: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4B · 154 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

154 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2025, 75 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

154
113

Total granted

$1.4B
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+2%

Still filing today

92%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58M · revenue +74%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $50M · revenue +8%
  • CH
    CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $47M · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.2M · revenue -7%
  • PT
    POWER TO DECIDE
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +6%
  • FA
    FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue ×84

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County

Educate the public on reproductive choice and healthcare options and advocate for public policies that support access to reproductive healthcare and education.

Civil Rights
2
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Inc

Organized to promote and coordinate the provision of education, counseling and clinical services and to support or oppose administrative action, regulations and legislation in the field of family planning and comprehensive sexual and…

—
3
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
4
Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin Inc

Advocating public policies which guarantee full and nondiscriminatory access to reproductive health care. fostering and pursuing a social and political climate favorable to the exercise of reproductive choice. encouraging and protecting…

Health
5
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
6
Planned Parenthood Votes Ct

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in connecticut.

—
7
Population Action International

Pai advances evidence, policies and programs to enable women, youth and at-risk communities to access sexual and reproductive health as core to health equity, climate resilience, economic well-being and gender equality.

Health
8
Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc

PP Advocates is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Our mission is to preserve and broaden access to reproductive health care through legislation, public education, and electoral activity.

—
9
Planned Parenthood Votes Ri

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in rhode island.

—
10
Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—
11
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma Inc

To provide, promote and protect reproductive and sexual health through health services, education and advocacy.

Health
12
Planned Parenthood Voters of Iowa

We mobilize supporters of all parties to defend and increase access to health care, particularly focused on reproductive health and education. we inspire and engage iowans to take up the cause of reproductive rights, health, education, and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains and the most unlike its peers is Instituto Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%53%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%7/293
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

272 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 272 of the 293 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

28
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
253/272
Grantees still filing
169/272
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Planned Parenthood Global Inc — $171,313,259 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Global IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $57,649,439 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $49,621,268 · HealthCLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC — $46,833,470 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $45,671,249 · Health+76 more — $929,748,673 · Health+76 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC — $16,733,033 · OtherAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC — $14,411,747 · OtherMT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $3,050,044 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF PA — $2,098,695 · Other+56 more — $13,576,829 · OtherNEVADA EDUCATION FUND FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES — $1,461,500 · Civil RightsNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $337,500 · Civil RightsInterfaith Voices For Repro — $205,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM — $200,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Education Fund — $193,125 · Civil RightsVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC — $169,000 · Civil RightsURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY — $165,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $163,000 · Civil RightsPLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF MI — $160,000 · Civil Rights+18 more — $1,259,332 · Civil RightsPLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF TEXAS — $1,942,223 · Human ServicesPOWER TO DECIDE — $500,000 · Human ServicesTHE AFIYA CENTER — $115,000 · Human ServicesBOLD FUTURES NM — $105,000 · Human Services+7 more — $345,000 · Human ServicesCapital for Good USA — $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $459,577 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $320,000 · PhilanthropyRockwood Leadership Institute — $132,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $40,000 · PhilanthropyNEO Philanthropy Inc — $360,000 · Public BenefitCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER — $250,000 · Public BenefitTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $185,000 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $100,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $92,000 · Public BenefitOne Voice — $75,000 · Public BenefitBALLOT INITIATIVE STRATEGY CENTER FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Public BenefitSTATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT — $50,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $363,077 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $175,000 · EnvironmentNational Network of Abortion Funds — $90,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS — $80,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $60,000 · EnvironmentFLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK — $50,000 · EnvironmentACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST — $47,500 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA ABORTION FUND — $40,000 · Environment
Health$1,300,837,358Other$49,870,348Civil Rights$4,313,457Human Services$3,007,223Philanthropy$2,951,577Public Benefit$1,162,000Environment$905,577

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPlanned Parenthood Global Inc — $171,313,259 over 9y, 100% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $57,649,439 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $49,621,268 over 7y, 15% of budgetCLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC — $46,833,470 over 6y, 11% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $45,671,249 over 9y, 14% of budgetBETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIP — $42,228,095 over 6y, 98% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois — $39,215,810 over 9y, 17% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC — $39,144,905 over 9y, 36% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC — $33,915,799 over 9y, 14% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $32,571,289 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES — $32,218,546 over 7y, 11% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC — $29,879,375 over 9y, 23% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $29,086,912 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC — $28,961,463 over 9y, 45% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC — $27,871,200 over 9y, 52% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $25,799,755 over 9y, 13% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA — $25,344,067 over 9y, 20% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $25,083,788 over 9y, 11% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $24,948,805 over 9y, 16% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc — $24,408,839 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $23,789,659 over 9y, 16% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $22,045,639 over 9y, 18% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $21,953,774 over 8y, 15% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $21,206,664 over 9y, 12% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION — $20,757,982 over 9y, 27% of budgetVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED — $19,559,825 over 9y, 33% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $19,360,541 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $18,219,409 over 9y, 34% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — $18,064,722 over 9y, 13% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC — $16,733,033 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE — $16,554,674 over 9y, 24% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC — $16,524,407 over 9y, 43% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC — $15,709,197 over 9y, 27% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC — $15,066,032 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST — $15,053,420 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $14,901,672 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri — $14,577,158 over 9y, 27% of budgetAFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC — $14,411,747 over 4y, 85% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC — $13,754,040 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC — $12,927,480 over 5y, 30% of budgetPlanned Parenthood South Texas — $11,390,905 over 9y, 24% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC — $10,653,013 over 9y, 30% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $9,702,742 over 9y, 10% of budgetReproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers — $9,468,948 over 7y, 67% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC — $9,004,398 over 9y, 50% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH — $8,890,522 over 9y, 12% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOODORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES INC — $8,392,467 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST — $7,955,950 over 9y, 5.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Global Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds CLINICAL HEALTH NETWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri ↗
  • Who funds AFFILIATE CHIEF EXECUTIVES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Planned Parenthood Ac…The Susan Thompson Bu…Hopewell FundMs Foundation for Wom…NEO Philanthropy IncGroundswell FundAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundWellspring Philanthro…Women Donors NetworkThe Ford FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…
Planned Parenthood Action Fund IncNY118.3× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Groundswell Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Women Donors Network · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc — 19% of income from government
  • National Black Justice Coalition Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 293 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines