How much did PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF grant in FY2023?

Health$814MCivil Rights$3.6MHuman Services$2.6MEnvironment$881kPhilanthropy$880kPublic Benefit$840kEducation$606kInternational$340kArts & Culture$217kOther$21M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

prohibitsppvsathispanic physicianssexual decisionsunintended pregnanciespracticeallow

2020

nbjcofficeendlgbtq sglmurdersgapperception

2021

tepnearlyfoodjobinclusivedirect aidgeneration latino

2022

hopewellabortion accessroeoklahomansemotionalabortion clinicslow

2023

higher heightspatientschurchfurthersapiavoteparentnative native

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 136 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k49 grants · $1.4M
$50k–250k28 grants · $2.6M
$250k+58 grants · $183M

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$458M

Total assets

Largest grants

PP GLOBAL INC$20,084,017
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC$8,959,663
BETTERHEALTH A PLANNED PARENTHOOD PARTNERSHIP$8,816,248
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KEN$7,886,403
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC$6,762,896
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC$6,555,079
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ILLINOIS$5,799,716
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL ST$5,543,738
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$5,323,779
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$4,105,299
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC$4,075,354
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC$3,916,833
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC$3,870,707
PP DIRECT INC$3,860,149
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$3,656,081

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 45% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$835M · 127 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

127 repeat relationships — 101 still active in FY2023, 26 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

127

Total granted

$835M

$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+100%

Still filing today

92%

78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PP
Planned parenthood global Inc
6× · 2018–2023 · $108M · revenue +36% · 100% of their budget
CH
Catalyst Health Network Inc
4× · 2020–2023 · $45M · revenue +105%
PP
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest
6× · 2018–2023 · $43M · revenue +8%

Funded once

TN
THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +60%
HOPEWELL FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $460k · revenue +59%
PP
PP PUBLIC POLICY NETWORK OF THE NORTHWEST & HAWAII
one grant, 2018 · $309k · revenue +1% · 80% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Planned Parenthood Votes Ri

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in Rhode Island.

—

Planned Parenthood Votes Ct

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in connecticut.

—

Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project

Educate the public on reproductive choice and healthcare options and advocate for public Policies that support access to reproductive healthcare and education.

Civil Rights

Planned Parenthood Advocates of

Advocating public policies which guarantee full and nondiscriminatory access to reproductive health.

Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health

Planned Parenthood Voters of Iowa

To inspire and engage constituents to support the reproductive health and rights cause.

—

Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—

International Planned Parenthood Federation

Ippfwhr (dba fos feminista) aims to improve the quality of life of individuals by promoting for sexual and reproductive health and rights through advocacy and services.

International

Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance

WRRAP's mission is to ensure that individuals from all walks of life are afforded the equal opportunity to gain access to safe and legal abortion services.

Health

Planned Parenthood San Antonio

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to those in need.

Health

Planned Parenthood Affiliates of

Organized to promote and coordinate the provision of education, counseling and clinical services and to support or oppose administrative action, regulations and legislation in the field of family planning and comprehensive sexual and…

—

Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena

Planned Parenthood Advocates Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley (PP Advocates) engages in legislative and electoral activity including advocacy, education campaigns, and grassroots organizing. We fight to create a personally and politically…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains and the most unlike its peers is Sundance Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%7/249

the rest of the field

11%

206,160/1,819,316

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

229 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

210/229

Grantees still filing

181/229

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$814,430,659Other$22,579,968Civil Rights$3,605,125Human Services$2,580,500Environment$880,577Philanthropy$879,577Public Benefit$840,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Thompson Buffett FoundationNE115.1× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · Groundswell Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · New Venture Fund · Women Donors Network · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · National Women's Law Center · Proteus Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

16get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Planned parenthood global Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 475312115 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Planned parenthood global Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Planned Parenthood Federation Of?

Find your warmest path to Planned Parenthood Federation Of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

229 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Planned Parenthood Federation Of?

More from the funding graph

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

229 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Planned Parenthood Federation Of?

More from the funding graph