Skip to content

Delaware · Private foundation

Planet Home Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
18
Organizations funded FY2021
56%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Planet Home Charitable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Planet Home Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 16 organizations, $250k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
12
’18
11
’19
2
’20
16
’21
4
’22
3
’23
3
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 18
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
7
Total assets, FY2021
$3.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 56% of the organizations Planet Home Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 56% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentFood & NutritionScience & TechHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202118$250k56%
FY20202$15k50%
FY201913$240k31%
FY201814$190k93%
FY20172$40kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$915kEnvironment$580kPhilanthropy$235kFood & Nutrition$105kHealth$45kArts & Culture$40kSocial Science$20kScience & Tech$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
CA
CO
AZ
KS
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Environmental Working Group$100,00070%
Earthjustice$90,00070%
Center for Food Safety$65,00031%
As You Sow$55,00070%
Center for Environmental Health$45,00020%
The 5 Gyres Institute$40,00041%
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc$35,00020%
350org$30,00030%
Solutions Project Inc$25,00011%
Big Blue & You Inc$25,000222%
Show all 26 grantees

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($105k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Planet Home Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEnvironmental Working Group: $100,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEarthjustice: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Food Safety: $65,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAs You Sow: $55,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Environmental Health: $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe 5 Gyres Institute: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNatural Resources Defense Council Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget350org: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSolutions Project Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBig Blue & You Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKiss the Ground: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSquaw Valley Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Fund Incorporated: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Long Now Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProtect Our Winters: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Land Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCenter for Biological Diversity Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Biomimicry Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSave The Bay: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCreative Visions Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Planet Home Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Planet Home Charitable Foundation

How much does Planet Home Charitable Foundation give?
Planet Home Charitable Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $250,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 18 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Planet Home Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (47%), Environment (30%), Philanthropy (12%).
Who are Planet Home Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Environmental Working Group ($100k), Earthjustice ($90k), Center for Food Safety ($65k).
Does Planet Home Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Planet Home Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Planet Home Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Marin Community Foundation, Impactassetsinc, The Schmidt Family Foundation.
Where is Planet Home Charitable Foundation based?
Planet Home Charitable Foundation is based in DE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Planet Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph