· Private foundation
Piper Sandler Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $166k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $69k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORPORATE MATCH | $2,078,802 |
| STUDENT SPONSOR PARTNERS INC | $260,000 |
| GREENWOOD PROJECT | $204,000 |
| WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS | $197,075 |
| DOUGHERTY FAMILY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY ST THOMAS | $155,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL TWIN CITIES | $150,300 |
| CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL | $150,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF HOUSTON | $150,000 |
| NJ LEEP INC | $150,000 |
| CHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $120,000 |
| THE POSSE FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| MINDS MATTER BAY AREA | $110,000 |
| SCHOLARS OF FINANCE | $108,000 |
| STREETWISE PARTNERS | $100,000 |
| DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
133 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGREENWOOD PROJECT5× · 2020–2025 · $708k · revenue +92%
- SPSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $670k · revenue +35%
- CPCHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $585k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- LSLake Street Councilone grant, 2020 · $114k · revenue -85%
- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolisone grant, 2022 · $105k · revenue -19%
- CRCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL (CRNYHS)one grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholars of Finance and the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
206 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 206 of the 316 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREENWOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BESTPREP ↗
- Who funds STREETWISE PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARS OF FINANCE ↗
- Who funds MINDS MATTER OF BAY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds NJ LEEP Inc ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCAT ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
- Who funds Right Moves for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds Lake Street Council ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS DOWNTOWN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds VIBRANT & SAFE DOWNTOWN ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Sit Investment Associates Foundation · The K Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Piper Sandler Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Italian Home for Children Inc — 29% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Union City Music Project Inc — 8% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Venice Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Piper Sandler Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Piper Sandler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.