Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pincus Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
104
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$846k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$13MEducation$6.8MRecreation & Sports$3.5MInternational$2.5MYouth Development$2.0MArts & Culture$1.6MFood & Nutrition$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 104 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k57 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE FUTBOL$846,402
CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC$700,000
THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND$296,355
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HI$252,502
SMITH MEMORIAL PLAYGROUNDS$150,000
LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP$150,000
THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY$150,000
THE PINCUS FUND FOR HUNGER RELIEF$125,000
PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC$125,000
CATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION$105,000
MANNA$100,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HI$100,000
BNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$90,000
FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC$75,000
THE SCHOOL MINDFULNESS PROJECT INC$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL CORP: $40k → 11%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $700k → 9%COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $2k → 14%GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $75k → 8%BANCROFT NEUROHEALTH: $25k → 12%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $700k → 9%SNACC INC: $10k → 17%GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $75k → 8%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $200k → 9%GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $38k → 8%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%REMAKE: $75k → 10%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $200k → 9%GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $25k → 8%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%NORTH CITY CONGRESS: $75k → 22%REMAKE: $25k → 10%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $200k → 9%GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $25k → 8%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%REMAKE: $10k → 10%NORTH CITY CONGRESS: $56k → 22%REMAKE: $1k → 10%MADONNA MISSION: $10k → 14%MADONNA MISSION: $10k → 14%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $10k → 7%NORTH CITY CONGRESS: $56k → 22%ANGELS OF GOD CLOTHING CLOSET: $1k → 8%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $10k → 7%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $10k → 7%HUMANGOOD PENNSYLVANIA: $35k → 14%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%ELWYN: $50k → 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $5k → 16%SNACC INC: $15k → 17%NORTH CITY CONGRESS: $25k → 22%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $25k → 17%NORTH CITY CONGRESS: $15k → 22%CHILDREN FIRST PA: $3k → 22%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $75k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 17%FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2k → 17%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $3k → 22%HIAS AND COUNCIL MIGRATION SERVICE OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of Pincus Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Pincus Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 34% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$32M · 123 repeat orgs$842k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

123 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

123
61

Total granted

$32M
$660k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+19%

Still filing today

93%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +180%
  • CG
    CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +86%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • BS
    Benchmark School
    one grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue +5%
  • TP
    THE PINCUS FUND FOR HUNGER RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • CF
    CCSA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
Philadelphia Youth Network Inc

Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…

Youth Development
3
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
4
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
5
Philadelphia Contemporary

We connect the people and places of philadelphia through art and partnership. the organization is a free-standing platform that endeavors to show forward-thinking, high-quality contemporary visual and performance art in the city. the…

Human Services
6
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
7
Philadelphia Performing Arts a String Theory Charter School

Charter school providing students a content rich, adademically rigerous core knowledge education with a well-defined, sequential curriculum in a safe, orderly disiplined and caring environment.

Education
8
The Philadelphia Education Fund

The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…

Youth Development
9
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
10
Partnership With Children Inc

Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.

—
11
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
12
Girls Inc of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

Our mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold through direct service and advocacy. in partnership with schools and at our girls inc. center, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself,…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education and the most unlike its peers is The Pincus Fund for Hunger Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Youth CampsCommunity Arts CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Elementary Literacy TutoringIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Mentoring ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …United Way AffiliatesJewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Food PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportChristian Missionary Organi…School District FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%15%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr17%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%12%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr15%48%35–55yr17%11%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/192
the rest of the field
9%
7,128/77,970

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 206 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
185/187
Grantees still filing
122/187
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $10,900,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA F…BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $923,998 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $425,000 · Health+3 more — $170,000 · HealthTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,307,159 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF …Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $1,192,512 · EducationTemple University - Of…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $658,657 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMB…LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC — $550,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP EDUCATION A…BLUE ENGINE INC — $495,000 · EducationBLUE ENGINE INCSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $380,000 · EducationSWARTHMORE COLLEGESOLAR YOUTH INC — $339,650 · EducationCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $329,502 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Education+19 more — $1,086,000 · Education+19 moreLOVE FUTBOL — $1,296,402 · OtherLOVE FUTBOLTEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HI — $999,046 · OtherTEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE…CITY YEAR INC — $387,500 · OtherTHE PINCUS FUND FOR HUNGER RELIEF — $370,000 · OtherBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $898,000 · OtherBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GI…METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $305,000 · OtherCATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION — $411,150 · OtherCATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION+81 more — $2,711,203 · Other+81 moreCHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC — $2,000,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS …GLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS — $238,500 · Human ServicesGLASSBORO …NORTH CITY CONGRESS — $228,750 · Human ServicesNORTH CITY…JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY — $125,000 · Human ServicesRemake — $111,000 · Human Services+18 more — $402,800 · Human Services+18 moreART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC — $220,000 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT — $175,000 · Arts & CulturePLAY ON PHILLY — $110,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $85,000 · Arts & CultureBUSHFIRE THEATRE OF PERFORMING ARTS — $75,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC HAVEN INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureTeens of Color Abroad Inc — $70,000 · Arts & Culture+23 more — $497,500 · Arts & CultureLOVE FUTBOL INC — $814,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED — $300,000 · InternationalMEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS — $150,000 · InternationalGRANT FOUNDATION INC — $127,500 · International+9 more — $151,500 · InternationalSMITH MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND & PLAYHOUSE INC — $599,634 · Recreation & SportsLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA — $350,000 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC — $202,500 · Recreation & SportsDIRECTED INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH INC EXCITE ALL STARS — $127,500 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+5 more — $84,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$12,418,998Education$6,638,480Other$7,378,301Human Services$3,106,050Arts & Culture$1,602,500International$1,543,000Recreation & Sports$1,414,134

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $10,900,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC — $2,000,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,307,159 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $1,192,512 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $923,998 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $898,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOVE FUTBOL INC — $814,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $658,657 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMITH MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND & PLAYHOUSE INC — $599,634 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetLEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC — $550,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetBLUE ENGINE INC — $495,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetTHE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY — $425,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCATCHAFIRE FOUNDATION — $411,150 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $387,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $380,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PINCUS FUND FOR HUNGER RELIEF — $370,000 over 5y, 94% of budgetLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA — $350,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSOLAR YOUTH INC — $339,650 over 5y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $329,502 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $305,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED — $300,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOKO URBAN FARMS INC — $241,100 over 5y, 43% of budgetGLASSBORO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS — $238,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetNORTH CITY CONGRESS — $228,750 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC — $220,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetTHE SCHOOL MINDFULNESS PROJECT — $205,000 over 5y, 59% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC — $202,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPRESERVATION HALL FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA — $197,200 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $187,500 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT — $175,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSUPRSEED Inc — $174,850 over 5y, 26% of budgetMEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS — $150,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE DINNER TABLE DOCUMENTARY INC — $147,900 over 5y, 45% of budgetDIRECTED INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH INC EXCITE ALL STARS — $127,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC — $127,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY — $125,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetINTERFAITH CENTER OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $115,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetRemake — $111,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetPLAY ON PHILLY — $110,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $100,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetWHYY INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREEVOLUTION — $95,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetFRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC — $95,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA OUTWARD BOUND CENTER — $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…Henrietta Tower Wurts…The William Penn Foun…The Patricia Kind Fam…Lindback Cr & Mf Foun…Connelly FoundationHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Barra Foundation …The Philadelphia Cult…The Allen Hilles FundUnited Way of Greater…Ludwick Fdn
The Philadelphia FoundationPA66.5× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Connelly Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · The Allen Hilles Fund · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Ludwick Fdn

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pincus Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Canal Dock Boathouse Incorporated — 28% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Solar Youth Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Leadership Education and Athletics in Partnership Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Music Haven Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Connecticut — 14% of income from government
  • Art Council of Greater New Haven Inc — 14% of income from government
  • New Haven Reads Community Book Bank Inc — 13% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Music School Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Cartie Corp — 3% of income from government
  • Partners for Educational Leadershipinc — 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Intempo Organization Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Nxthvn Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pincus Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pincus Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 206 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines